Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pagan priest" data-source="post: 1114276" data-attributes="member: 7650"><p>Quite a lot has already been said, some it valid.</p><p></p><p>First, let us put the "blame" for this where it belongs. Valar and the BoEF most likely were the catalyst for this change, but the blame still must rest solely on the heads of those who performed the action, in this case WoTC. Valar did not force a response, certainly not this particular response. WoTC could have chosen any of a number of responses.</p><p></p><p>While WoTC has the right (legally) to change the d20 license in any way they choose, at any time they choose, what they have done here is bad. As has been pointed out, this will have the efect of stifling creativity within the d20 license. While some of that creativity may simply be chased to the OGL, it is also possible that it will go to other game systems entirely, leaving what has been my favorite game for 26 years that much poorer as a direct result.</p><p></p><p>A point that has not yet been made, the policy as written is discriminatory. It is saying that females, by their very nature, are purile in a way that males are not. Am I the only one that has a problem with this?</p><p></p><p>As another flaw in WoTC's reasoning, consider this image:</p><p></p><p>A woman, sitting. It is obvious that she is completely topless.</p><p></p><p>(So far, this might be a no-no...)</p><p></p><p>A nipple is visible.</p><p></p><p>(Okay, now it is definately a no-no...)</p><p></p><p>The other nipple is not visible because something is in the way.</p><p></p><p>(Doesn't change anything yet.)</p><p></p><p>She is holding a baby to the obscured breast to suckle.</p><p></p><p>(Now, by all that is right and holy, this should make it legit all by itself, but America has some pretty sick and twisted attitudes about breast feeding...)</p><p></p><p>She is seated on a throne (not an euphemism, we won't go there)</p><p></p><p>(Still doen't change things as far as the d20 license goes...)</p><p></p><p>She is Isis, and the baby is Pharoh.</p><p></p><p>This is a real world depiction of a real world Goddess(*), and WoTC wants to say it is not allowed? Now we have religious descrimination to go with the sex discrimination.</p><p></p><p>(*) Yes I am aware that there are not nearly as many Isis worshipers now as there was 20 or 30 centuries ago, but that is irrelevant.</p><p></p><p>WoTC needs to withdraw this change immediately.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pagan priest, post: 1114276, member: 7650"] Quite a lot has already been said, some it valid. First, let us put the "blame" for this where it belongs. Valar and the BoEF most likely were the catalyst for this change, but the blame still must rest solely on the heads of those who performed the action, in this case WoTC. Valar did not force a response, certainly not this particular response. WoTC could have chosen any of a number of responses. While WoTC has the right (legally) to change the d20 license in any way they choose, at any time they choose, what they have done here is bad. As has been pointed out, this will have the efect of stifling creativity within the d20 license. While some of that creativity may simply be chased to the OGL, it is also possible that it will go to other game systems entirely, leaving what has been my favorite game for 26 years that much poorer as a direct result. A point that has not yet been made, the policy as written is discriminatory. It is saying that females, by their very nature, are purile in a way that males are not. Am I the only one that has a problem with this? As another flaw in WoTC's reasoning, consider this image: A woman, sitting. It is obvious that she is completely topless. (So far, this might be a no-no...) A nipple is visible. (Okay, now it is definately a no-no...) The other nipple is not visible because something is in the way. (Doesn't change anything yet.) She is holding a baby to the obscured breast to suckle. (Now, by all that is right and holy, this should make it legit all by itself, but America has some pretty sick and twisted attitudes about breast feeding...) She is seated on a throne (not an euphemism, we won't go there) (Still doen't change things as far as the d20 license goes...) She is Isis, and the baby is Pharoh. This is a real world depiction of a real world Goddess(*), and WoTC wants to say it is not allowed? Now we have religious descrimination to go with the sex discrimination. (*) Yes I am aware that there are not nearly as many Isis worshipers now as there was 20 or 30 centuries ago, but that is irrelevant. WoTC needs to withdraw this change immediately. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
Top