Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 1115376" data-attributes="member: 5724"><p>I'm sorry if that's how you interpreted what I said. I was simply pointing out that Mr. Valterra knew of the coming change, knew what was going to be changed, and knew the reason behind the change. No matter how much he disaggreed with the change, and in this I think we agree, the change is stupid, I find his use of another's trademark to promote a work that the owner of the trademark doesn't want promoted, and who is taking explicit legal recourse to prevent such material, questionable.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No matter what they are, or become, the trademark is theirs. The only reason why anyone else can use it is that it promotes their products. The entire purpose of the trademark is to sell more players handbooks. Mr. Valterra's deliberate use of their trademark in a manner in which they were in the steps of preventing, and of which he had full knowledge of, shows a lack of respect to WotC.</p><p></p><p>Basically, he wanted to get his book of sexual material out and make additional profit off using another's trademark with the foreknowledge that the owners of the trademark were trying explictly to prevent such sexual materials being put out under their trademark. No matter what you call it, that's a lack of respect, and it lets me know that Mr. Valterra is willing to be disrespectful of WotC to increase profitablity, for there is no other reason to include the d20 system logo except to increase profitability. That is the purpose of the logo.</p><p></p><p>Everyone knew he was pushing the d20 license into areas that were potentially unwanted by WotC when he announced his product. Now we know he was doing exactly what they didn't want, and unlike other publishers working on/releasing sexual material, he had explict information that what he was doing was not what WotC wanted for their trademark.</p><p></p><p>And please don't take my criticism of Mr. Valterra as a personal shot. I admire him for what he has done for the d20 license and his efforts to try and stop the idiocy that they're doing now. I don't admire him for his actions after losing that fight and his creation/promotion of his new product. But that is his business, and I expect him to do what he thinks best for his own interest.</p><p></p><p>joe b.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 1115376, member: 5724"] I'm sorry if that's how you interpreted what I said. I was simply pointing out that Mr. Valterra knew of the coming change, knew what was going to be changed, and knew the reason behind the change. No matter how much he disaggreed with the change, and in this I think we agree, the change is stupid, I find his use of another's trademark to promote a work that the owner of the trademark doesn't want promoted, and who is taking explicit legal recourse to prevent such material, questionable. No matter what they are, or become, the trademark is theirs. The only reason why anyone else can use it is that it promotes their products. The entire purpose of the trademark is to sell more players handbooks. Mr. Valterra's deliberate use of their trademark in a manner in which they were in the steps of preventing, and of which he had full knowledge of, shows a lack of respect to WotC. Basically, he wanted to get his book of sexual material out and make additional profit off using another's trademark with the foreknowledge that the owners of the trademark were trying explictly to prevent such sexual materials being put out under their trademark. No matter what you call it, that's a lack of respect, and it lets me know that Mr. Valterra is willing to be disrespectful of WotC to increase profitablity, for there is no other reason to include the d20 system logo except to increase profitability. That is the purpose of the logo. Everyone knew he was pushing the d20 license into areas that were potentially unwanted by WotC when he announced his product. Now we know he was doing exactly what they didn't want, and unlike other publishers working on/releasing sexual material, he had explict information that what he was doing was not what WotC wanted for their trademark. And please don't take my criticism of Mr. Valterra as a personal shot. I admire him for what he has done for the d20 license and his efforts to try and stop the idiocy that they're doing now. I don't admire him for his actions after losing that fight and his creation/promotion of his new product. But that is his business, and I expect him to do what he thinks best for his own interest. joe b. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Quality Standards" in the d20 System Guide
Top