Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tovec" data-source="post: 6230015" data-attributes="member: 95493">I was only replying to what you wrote, and the inference of those words.So, the relevant parts you made red were:So ^^ this was replying to..You kind of did. You were happy to not be compensated at quest completion because you received XP. Therefore others should be is the logical inference - especially based on the singular focus you had in your first reply. You seemed to outline that he shouldn't try to compensate all the players, and that they should be happy enough with just XP - as you were.And..(Left in the rest of the  sentence too, kind of important.)Was for..What was your objection here? That I am somehow putting words in your mouth? Granted you didn't say 'entitlement' but generally speaking when I see an argument which goes something like 'don't fulfill their wants because it will be bad' it usually has to do with thinking they are only wanting these things because of entitlement. I made a bit of a jump but not a huge one based on my prior experience here. If the 'entitlement' part is your objection then that is fair. But when you include the rest of the comment (wanting and deserving) then you see that is not the only thing I am saying.So, in that regard, reasons (why do you think it is bad, not just that you do think it is bad) do you have that fulfilling wants is bad, and how are they different from deserved (rewards?) compensation?</blockquote>