Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
Question about an elf ranger build
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 5412123" data-attributes="member: 98255"><p>Yes, you will have a very hard time getting halfway decent damage out of a Warlock, and there is no way it will ever come close to ranger damage.</p><p></p><p>As has been pointed out, warlocks do a moderate amount of damage, with a plethora of control effects. It is very flavourful, but it isn't all that effective most of the time, in my experience. Warlocks also suffer from mediocre accuracy and defences, with only Prime Shot to help accuracy and Shadow Walk to help defences.</p><p></p><p>You can shore up accuracy by taking Wand or Rod Expertise, and Superior Implement Proficiency with an Accurate Wand or Accurate Rod. I would go with Rods, since Expertise gives you a +1 to AC and Reflex as well.</p><p></p><p>Improvements to damage can be had in the usual way; Implement Focus (Wand) or (Rod) for +1 per tier to damage is a good start. If you can manage the 13 Dex requirement, Dual Implement Spellcaster is nice, as it allows you to add the enhancement bonus of an offhand implement to your damage.</p><p></p><p>A decent combination with this is to take a Pact Blade as your offhand implement, and apply it to a Parrying Dagger (has the Defensive property) for another +1 AC. Pact Blades are cheap, but you will need to slot a Weapon Proficiency in Parrying Dagger before you can cash in on this.</p><p></p><p>It's a little feat-intensive, but all the little bonuses add up.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and if you make a Starlock, choose Con or Cha and stick with it, ignoring the other powers. It's too difficult to maintain both attack stats and still have decent AC (which will be coming from your Int, which should be your Secondary stat).</p><p></p><p>Technically, this applies to any warlock, as the advice they give in the PHB to keep a decent score in your 'other' attack stat in case you want to take powers from other pacts is just bad advice. You could do this, but those powers you do take will rarely hit, which will result in you not using them, which kind of makes it pointless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nemesis Destiny, post: 5412123, member: 98255"] Yes, you will have a very hard time getting halfway decent damage out of a Warlock, and there is no way it will ever come close to ranger damage. As has been pointed out, warlocks do a moderate amount of damage, with a plethora of control effects. It is very flavourful, but it isn't all that effective most of the time, in my experience. Warlocks also suffer from mediocre accuracy and defences, with only Prime Shot to help accuracy and Shadow Walk to help defences. You can shore up accuracy by taking Wand or Rod Expertise, and Superior Implement Proficiency with an Accurate Wand or Accurate Rod. I would go with Rods, since Expertise gives you a +1 to AC and Reflex as well. Improvements to damage can be had in the usual way; Implement Focus (Wand) or (Rod) for +1 per tier to damage is a good start. If you can manage the 13 Dex requirement, Dual Implement Spellcaster is nice, as it allows you to add the enhancement bonus of an offhand implement to your damage. A decent combination with this is to take a Pact Blade as your offhand implement, and apply it to a Parrying Dagger (has the Defensive property) for another +1 AC. Pact Blades are cheap, but you will need to slot a Weapon Proficiency in Parrying Dagger before you can cash in on this. It's a little feat-intensive, but all the little bonuses add up. Oh, and if you make a Starlock, choose Con or Cha and stick with it, ignoring the other powers. It's too difficult to maintain both attack stats and still have decent AC (which will be coming from your Int, which should be your Secondary stat). Technically, this applies to any warlock, as the advice they give in the PHB to keep a decent score in your 'other' attack stat in case you want to take powers from other pacts is just bad advice. You could do this, but those powers you do take will rarely hit, which will result in you not using them, which kind of makes it pointless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Character Builds & Optimization
Question about an elf ranger build
Top