Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 598301" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Another thought I had on the subject (and please tell me if I'm simply getting too complicated or reading too much into the rules as stated), but technically the description of arrows never says -when- the arrow is destroyed.&nbsp; It could be argued that for the purposes of recovery its destroyed, but that maybe removing an arrow is a free action, so targets hit with arrows have to wait until their next turn to remove them - thus leaving themselves open to having a spell cast on them that explodes the arrow.&nbsp; Or, even if the arrow's destruction were fairly immediate, that still doesn't completely rule out preparing an action (in this case, the spell) to go off the moment after the arrow does damage, but before it is &quot;destroyed.&quot;&nbsp; Hence, my quandary...&nbsp; Again, is this reading too much into things, or a good house rule situation, or what does anyone think?</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 598301, member: 9789"] Another thought I had on the subject (and please tell me if I'm simply getting too complicated or reading too much into the rules as stated), but technically the description of arrows never says -when- the arrow is destroyed. It could be argued that for the purposes of recovery its destroyed, but that maybe removing an arrow is a free action, so targets hit with arrows have to wait until their next turn to remove them - thus leaving themselves open to having a spell cast on them that explodes the arrow. Or, even if the arrow's destruction were fairly immediate, that still doesn't completely rule out preparing an action (in this case, the spell) to go off the moment after the arrow does damage, but before it is "destroyed." Hence, my quandary... Again, is this reading too much into things, or a good house rule situation, or what does anyone think? [/QUOTE]

Verification