Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question about Dispel Magic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 2643019" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>I don't think anything in the <em>Dispel Magic</em> description indicates you need to see the spell visually. You just need to know it's there and it needs to be in range of the spell. A Spellcraft check would have allowed the spellcaster a chance to recognize the spell as it was cast, if the <em>fear</em> was caused by a spell. If not, or if the Spellcraft check fails, another Spellcraft check would allow the wizard to recognize an ongoing magical <em>fear</em> effect present on the fighter. A success at either check would allow the wizard to successfully target the <em>fear</em> with <em>Dispel Magic</em>, IMO.No. If a spellcaster chooses to target an individual, all spells on that individual have a chance of being dispelled, including those cast by the spellcaster. Likewise, if the spellcaster chooses to target an area, then spells are checked in a specific order by <em>Dispel Magic</em> to determine if a spell is dispelled, and which one is so removed. A spellcaster cannot choose to ignore some of the spells on the target(s) in these cases, whether he cast them or not.</p><p></p><p>The only way for the spellcaster to avoid removing other spells is for him to target the <em>fear</em> effect specifically. In the case of the fighter, this should work fine. Were more than one PC affected by the <em>fear</em> effect, or were the fighter under the effects of multiple detrimental spells, you'd be in a real pickle, however.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 2643019, member: 707"] I don't think anything in the [i]Dispel Magic[/i] description indicates you need to see the spell visually. You just need to know it's there and it needs to be in range of the spell. A Spellcraft check would have allowed the spellcaster a chance to recognize the spell as it was cast, if the [i]fear[/i] was caused by a spell. If not, or if the Spellcraft check fails, another Spellcraft check would allow the wizard to recognize an ongoing magical [i]fear[/i] effect present on the fighter. A success at either check would allow the wizard to successfully target the [i]fear[/i] with [i]Dispel Magic[/i], IMO.No. If a spellcaster chooses to target an individual, all spells on that individual have a chance of being dispelled, including those cast by the spellcaster. Likewise, if the spellcaster chooses to target an area, then spells are checked in a specific order by [i]Dispel Magic[/i] to determine if a spell is dispelled, and which one is so removed. A spellcaster cannot choose to ignore some of the spells on the target(s) in these cases, whether he cast them or not. The only way for the spellcaster to avoid removing other spells is for him to target the [i]fear[/i] effect specifically. In the case of the fighter, this should work fine. Were more than one PC affected by the [i]fear[/i] effect, or were the fighter under the effects of multiple detrimental spells, you'd be in a real pickle, however. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question about Dispel Magic
Top