Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vilous" data-source="post: 237504" data-attributes="member: 5536">Yes, I can see how that kind of intent can be read from the rules. Believe me, if I didn't see at least something along those lines, I wouldn't be asking <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />However, since we seem to be touching on thinking through the phyics of the weapon as rationalization, it wouldn't be too hard to rationalize that your second hand would give extra leverage (and thus the extra str bonus) on the primary hand.Even that said, I can see how it could be interpreted as you describe as well.  But I can see it the other way too.I guess I am just asking if there is something more 'official' that clarifies this (like the issue of Dragon where Chris addresses this?) As the existing rules, as presented, just seem vague to me.</blockquote>