Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question about the Globes of Invulnerability.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Plane Sailing" data-source="post: 1444254" data-attributes="member: 114"><p>In 3e it excluded all 0-3rd spells including your own buffs. So in 3.5e they made it ineffective against already cast spells removing in a stroke one of its greatest defensive benefits (troubled by a silence spell? a silent MGoI will make it go away instantly and you can get on with business! (good as a contingency option if facing clerical opposition).</p><p></p><p>BUT the example they give in 3.5e contradicts their new text about it not affecting pre-existing spells (since it has the same text about mirror images winking out if they enter the area).</p><p></p><p>Not to mention, logically, how can the GoI "know" whether mirror image was cast before or after it was? Plain stupid.</p><p></p><p>They ought to go with the original point of the spell that it doesn't hinder the caster but prevents spells of the appropriate levels affecting him, or just let him live without his buffs (he can always have items anyway).</p><p></p><p>Basically the 3.5e definition spoils its best defensive use and is contradictory too. Best to come to a mutual agreement between DM and players IMO.</p><p></p><p>Cheers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Plane Sailing, post: 1444254, member: 114"] In 3e it excluded all 0-3rd spells including your own buffs. So in 3.5e they made it ineffective against already cast spells removing in a stroke one of its greatest defensive benefits (troubled by a silence spell? a silent MGoI will make it go away instantly and you can get on with business! (good as a contingency option if facing clerical opposition). BUT the example they give in 3.5e contradicts their new text about it not affecting pre-existing spells (since it has the same text about mirror images winking out if they enter the area). Not to mention, logically, how can the GoI "know" whether mirror image was cast before or after it was? Plain stupid. They ought to go with the original point of the spell that it doesn't hinder the caster but prevents spells of the appropriate levels affecting him, or just let him live without his buffs (he can always have items anyway). Basically the 3.5e definition spoils its best defensive use and is contradictory too. Best to come to a mutual agreement between DM and players IMO. Cheers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question about the Globes of Invulnerability.
Top