Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question concerning Mithril
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sejs" data-source="post: 1747243" data-attributes="member: 4910"><p>The "..." jump there containing the text <em>"(for example, whether a barbarian can use her fast movement ability while wearing the armor or not) heavy armors are treated as medium, and"</em>. The problem there being that the text makes mention of an ability that is restricted to certain categories of armor such as fast movement, evasion, etc. It makes no mention one way or the other as to proficiency, and as such is open to interpretation in either way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, the way I run it, armor made of mithral still requires the original proficiency of the base armor, but is treated as one category lighter for purposes of movement and other armor-category restricted abilities. If you don't have the appropriate proficiency, you still take the (lowered by mithral) ACP to all movement-related actions, as per standard. Different categories of armor require that you learn to move your body in different ways to compensate, not just for the weight, but also for the restriction in how you can maneuver due to the armor getting in the way of things. Even if the armor is made of a lighter metal like mithral, the same components are present and still limit your range of motion like they normally would.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sejs, post: 1747243, member: 4910"] The "..." jump there containing the text [i]"(for example, whether a barbarian can use her fast movement ability while wearing the armor or not) heavy armors are treated as medium, and"[/i]. The problem there being that the text makes mention of an ability that is restricted to certain categories of armor such as fast movement, evasion, etc. It makes no mention one way or the other as to proficiency, and as such is open to interpretation in either way. Personally, the way I run it, armor made of mithral still requires the original proficiency of the base armor, but is treated as one category lighter for purposes of movement and other armor-category restricted abilities. If you don't have the appropriate proficiency, you still take the (lowered by mithral) ACP to all movement-related actions, as per standard. Different categories of armor require that you learn to move your body in different ways to compensate, not just for the weight, but also for the restriction in how you can maneuver due to the armor getting in the way of things. Even if the armor is made of a lighter metal like mithral, the same components are present and still limit your range of motion like they normally would. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question concerning Mithril
Top