Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question concerning Mithril
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeff Wilder" data-source="post: 1748583" data-attributes="member: 5122"><p>I agree with the folks that say that even though an armor "counts as" lighter armor, you still need the original proficiency to use it without penalty. In my view, proficiency with armor includes knowing when and how the armor you're wearing can be expected to turn or deflect blows, as opposed to when and how you need to take more active measures. I also think that in order to view armor proficiencies as being anywhere <em>close</em> to "worth a feat," the proficiency needs as much utility as possible, and that means retaining some penalties for not having it.</p><p></p><p>In support of the opposite argument, however, there are many WotC-published examples of armor that clearly take the opposite view. The latest that I read was in <em>Underdark</em>, where it was clearly stated that one of the specific armors was always treated as light armor, and indicated that meant it could be worn without penalty by someone with just the Light Armor proficiency. There have been several other examples that I can't specifically point to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeff Wilder, post: 1748583, member: 5122"] I agree with the folks that say that even though an armor "counts as" lighter armor, you still need the original proficiency to use it without penalty. In my view, proficiency with armor includes knowing when and how the armor you're wearing can be expected to turn or deflect blows, as opposed to when and how you need to take more active measures. I also think that in order to view armor proficiencies as being anywhere [i]close[/i] to "worth a feat," the proficiency needs as much utility as possible, and that means retaining some penalties for not having it. In support of the opposite argument, however, there are many WotC-published examples of armor that clearly take the opposite view. The latest that I read was in [i]Underdark[/i], where it was clearly stated that one of the specific armors was always treated as light armor, and indicated that meant it could be worn without penalty by someone with just the Light Armor proficiency. There have been several other examples that I can't specifically point to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question concerning Mithril
Top