Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="johnsemlak" data-source="post: 494548" data-attributes="member: 7233">OK, here's my two cents then, from someone who started with the 83 box set.I have just restarted my D&D career after 10 years completely out, am planning to use Greyhawk in the campaign I run, with the 83 box set (ESD, I don't have the original) and the LGG.I do surf Canonfire and the Codex site occasionally.I don't do the Living Greyhawk campaign.  I plan to adapt to my group's taste by adding a Russian-flavor kingdom somewhere, probably hedged in near the Wolf and Tiger Nomads.  (If anyone has a better idea let me know).I like WoG because of (in addition to reasons stated in the 'what makes Greyhawk great' page at canonfire):- the intriguing history, espeically the seul wars and the cataclisms.-the classic modules, especiially GDQ and WG4.-cool artifacts in the 1e DMG, intertwined with WoG-the cool pantheon, especially the evil deities like Tharizdun and EEG-the fact that AD&D was more or less intertwined with WoG, at least in my experience.Things I would like to see for WoG in the future:More WoG products (!!!)More development of Oerth beyond the  Flanness3E versions of some more classic modules, like GDQ and WG4More regions (not necessarily in the Flanaess) with a 'flavor', historical flavors in particular (Oriental, Russian, African, etc)My two kopeks.</blockquote>