Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question for the Paizo folks regarding D&D's state of today
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hippy" data-source="post: 5431976" data-attributes="member: 63574"><p>I can appreciate the "hassle" aspect, but I am a 40ish gamer and frankly we have begun to embrace the notion of online connection just to game on a semi-regular basis. We have utilized Skype video conferencing and it has worked very well. In a couple of instances I have been able to "join" the group when I could not otherwise come in person. In one instance I was sick with a slight cold. Not a big deal normally, but we play at a nursing home where one of the players is a resident, and I did not want to bring in any illness that could maker him or the other residents ill. In another instance I had to be home to watch my kids. Suffice to say without the skype I would not have played at all.</p><p></p><p>On a separate note, I use D20Pro for a virtual table top in my home game. We are all around the table, but the ease of creating FOG without having to manually draw out what they can see and not see has hugely sped up the amount we can get to in an evening. This is very important when we can only meet every other week for the game. </p><p></p><p>The success of the D20Pro has made my use of WOTC and metal minis at the table less and less relevant. In all honesty it has not taken away from the experience of the "feel of D&D" at the table, just made it easier and quicker to get to the story and action. It also is easier for one of my players to see the action as I can zoom in on any part of the map battle areas, etc. He has vision issues and sometimes he could not follow the minis as easy on a battle mat.</p><p></p><p>So to make a long explanation short (too late I know) the idea of WOTC moving to a online virtual table top makes perfect sense, and frankly what they promised from the very beginning of the 4e switch. The just have not been able to deliver much that way until now with the 4e beta. I am a 3.5 (and soon to be Pathfinder) player, but the version is irrelevant, that fact is if the medium (online) improves your game for ease of use or frequency of play...people will use it and pay for it if the quality is there. Granted WOTC has missed the boat on the quality aspect to date for many customers...but give them time, I think it will change out of necessity if nothing else.</p><p></p><p>Just my two electrum..</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p></p><p>hippy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hippy, post: 5431976, member: 63574"] I can appreciate the "hassle" aspect, but I am a 40ish gamer and frankly we have begun to embrace the notion of online connection just to game on a semi-regular basis. We have utilized Skype video conferencing and it has worked very well. In a couple of instances I have been able to "join" the group when I could not otherwise come in person. In one instance I was sick with a slight cold. Not a big deal normally, but we play at a nursing home where one of the players is a resident, and I did not want to bring in any illness that could maker him or the other residents ill. In another instance I had to be home to watch my kids. Suffice to say without the skype I would not have played at all. On a separate note, I use D20Pro for a virtual table top in my home game. We are all around the table, but the ease of creating FOG without having to manually draw out what they can see and not see has hugely sped up the amount we can get to in an evening. This is very important when we can only meet every other week for the game. The success of the D20Pro has made my use of WOTC and metal minis at the table less and less relevant. In all honesty it has not taken away from the experience of the "feel of D&D" at the table, just made it easier and quicker to get to the story and action. It also is easier for one of my players to see the action as I can zoom in on any part of the map battle areas, etc. He has vision issues and sometimes he could not follow the minis as easy on a battle mat. So to make a long explanation short (too late I know) the idea of WOTC moving to a online virtual table top makes perfect sense, and frankly what they promised from the very beginning of the 4e switch. The just have not been able to deliver much that way until now with the 4e beta. I am a 3.5 (and soon to be Pathfinder) player, but the version is irrelevant, that fact is if the medium (online) improves your game for ease of use or frequency of play...people will use it and pay for it if the quality is there. Granted WOTC has missed the boat on the quality aspect to date for many customers...but give them time, I think it will change out of necessity if nothing else. Just my two electrum.. Cheers, hippy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question for the Paizo folks regarding D&D's state of today
Top