Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Question: How robust is 5th edition vs absent character?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5977652" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>Bingo!</p><p></p><p>Many people are only seeing what they want to see.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>No <em>we</em> weren't. The OP was asking the opinion of those that have seen 5E (as he didn't download or play in the playtest) as to whether they thought 5E could handle the parameters that he discussed. It was a very concrete and specific question, and completely not about <em>feel</em>.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I get the imression that nothing short of the presence of a complete, unaltered, straight-up 4E mechanic is going to satisfy you.</p><p> </p><p>That's both unrealistic and choosing a standard that no game or edition, other than your preferred one(s), can ever possibly achieve.</p><p> </p><p>If your mind is so made up, why are you here...? Why do you continue posts and statements that seem to be attempting nothing but trying to poison the 5E well...?<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Absolute Balderdash.</p><p> </p><p>If that's all you're seeing, it's because that's all you <em>want</em> to see.</p><p> </p><p>They are doing nothing more than what they said they were going to do right from the start:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>They are still in the process of designing the base game, based on the common and iconic elements of <em>all</em> D&D...not the common and iconic elements of just 4E or 3E or 1E or BD&D or any one edition. That is not <em>dialing back</em> from 4E, and saying so is an absolute falsehood. What they are doing is finding the most common and iconic elements of D&D that ring true throughout <em>all</em> the editions, designing a simple base game from that, and then expanding back up from there. However, we have not yet reached the <em>expanding-back-up-from-there</em> phase. And that eliminates the ability of anyone to f<em>actually</em> say things like <em>"5E is dialing back from 4E"</em>.</p><p> </p><p>If you don't see what they are doing for what it really is, fine. But I'd ask that when gamers come along here that haven't played the playtest, and are looking for information, that you provide them <em>objective</em>, <em>unbiased</em>, and <em>factual</em> information...rather than simply your opinion couched as fact. Especially as it seems to be opinion intended to try and poison the well (as I have yet to see any constructive contribution on your part to making 5E a game that you do want, rather than just bashing it for what it doesn't have and continuing to express you have no hope that it will ever be what you want...)</p><p> </p><p>That doesn't mean you're not allowed to express your opinion. But when doing so, say that they are only your opinions. It's quite easy to drop in an <em>"IMO"</em>, <em>"I think..."</em>, or <em>"I feel..."</em>...and such qualifiers can make all the difference in the world.</p><p> </p><p>In the end though, one can only either be an optimistic and constructive part of influencing 5E, a mere spectator, or attempt to negatively influence it's direction and the opinions of others. There are no other possibilities, that's the entire spectrum of interest possible in 5E. I'd certainly hope that your choice would be the first option, but you have the right to choose whichever you want. I'd only ask that if your choice is and continues to be the last one, that you didn't post here in this forum (New Horizons). This forum is for those that <em>do</em> want to be a part of 5E, and want to be a part of influencing it to be the best game/edition it can be. It's not intended for those that have no hope in the game, are unwilling to be a constructive part of making it a game they want, and it most certainly is not for bashing 5E or posting in a manner to turn others off from it.</p><p> </p><p>Of course though, it's 100% your choice, and also your right to post here in this forum regardless of what I've asked. I'm only making a request, not delivering an ultimatum. But, I won't stand by and idly watch someone try to negatively influence people towards 5E, and will continue to refute every innacurate and negatively biased statement I read here...with real <em>facts</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5977652, member: 59506"] Bingo! Many people are only seeing what they want to see. No [I]we[/I] weren't. The OP was asking the opinion of those that have seen 5E (as he didn't download or play in the playtest) as to whether they thought 5E could handle the parameters that he discussed. It was a very concrete and specific question, and completely not about [I]feel[/I]. I get the imression that nothing short of the presence of a complete, unaltered, straight-up 4E mechanic is going to satisfy you. That's both unrealistic and choosing a standard that no game or edition, other than your preferred one(s), can ever possibly achieve. If your mind is so made up, why are you here...? Why do you continue posts and statements that seem to be attempting nothing but trying to poison the 5E well...?:erm: Absolute Balderdash. If that's all you're seeing, it's because that's all you [I]want[/I] to see. They are doing nothing more than what they said they were going to do right from the start: They are still in the process of designing the base game, based on the common and iconic elements of [I]all[/I] D&D...not the common and iconic elements of just 4E or 3E or 1E or BD&D or any one edition. That is not [I]dialing back[/I] from 4E, and saying so is an absolute falsehood. What they are doing is finding the most common and iconic elements of D&D that ring true throughout [I]all[/I] the editions, designing a simple base game from that, and then expanding back up from there. However, we have not yet reached the [I]expanding-back-up-from-there[/I] phase. And that eliminates the ability of anyone to f[I]actually[/I] say things like [I]"5E is dialing back from 4E"[/I]. If you don't see what they are doing for what it really is, fine. But I'd ask that when gamers come along here that haven't played the playtest, and are looking for information, that you provide them [I]objective[/I], [I]unbiased[/I], and [I]factual[/I] information...rather than simply your opinion couched as fact. Especially as it seems to be opinion intended to try and poison the well (as I have yet to see any constructive contribution on your part to making 5E a game that you do want, rather than just bashing it for what it doesn't have and continuing to express you have no hope that it will ever be what you want...) That doesn't mean you're not allowed to express your opinion. But when doing so, say that they are only your opinions. It's quite easy to drop in an [I]"IMO"[/I], [I]"I think..."[/I], or [I]"I feel..."[/I]...and such qualifiers can make all the difference in the world. In the end though, one can only either be an optimistic and constructive part of influencing 5E, a mere spectator, or attempt to negatively influence it's direction and the opinions of others. There are no other possibilities, that's the entire spectrum of interest possible in 5E. I'd certainly hope that your choice would be the first option, but you have the right to choose whichever you want. I'd only ask that if your choice is and continues to be the last one, that you didn't post here in this forum (New Horizons). This forum is for those that [I]do[/I] want to be a part of 5E, and want to be a part of influencing it to be the best game/edition it can be. It's not intended for those that have no hope in the game, are unwilling to be a constructive part of making it a game they want, and it most certainly is not for bashing 5E or posting in a manner to turn others off from it. Of course though, it's 100% your choice, and also your right to post here in this forum regardless of what I've asked. I'm only making a request, not delivering an ultimatum. But, I won't stand by and idly watch someone try to negatively influence people towards 5E, and will continue to refute every innacurate and negatively biased statement I read here...with real [I]facts[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Question: How robust is 5th edition vs absent character?
Top