Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 5977876" data-attributes="member: 996">The post I was replying to /was/.&nbsp; Better mechanics than those in 4e would delight me, whether they were an obvious evolution thereof that was still very similar or a radical new idea.&nbsp; &nbsp;Nod. Which is why now's the time for honest feedback, not 'wait and see.'Which is 'dialing back from 4e,' yes.&nbsp; By definition, you reach back to the past and average out the advances the game has made, you have something dailed back.&nbsp; First you say it's absolutely false, then you re-phrase it.&nbsp; I do.&nbsp; That's why my posts come off as so negative.&nbsp; Because 5e is in a pretty sorry state right now.&nbsp; That's to be expected, it's in development and should improve as that process continues.&nbsp; I can't give it credit for that improvement until it's happened, though.Well, you're wrong.&nbsp; I may be cynical, but I'm a reallist and I am making constructive criticisms of 5e.&nbsp; They may not be truths you (or the designers) want to hear, but they're more valuable than the gushing of yes-men if they can be stomached.Request denied.&nbsp; I will continue to tell the unvarnished truth about 5e.&nbsp; No spin.&nbsp; No credit for vaporware.&nbsp; No wait and see.&nbsp; Good luck with that.&nbsp; It didn't help much when we tried to defend 4e from the constant torrent of lies and negativity of the edition war.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 5977876, member: 996"] The post I was replying to /was/. Better mechanics than those in 4e would delight me, whether they were an obvious evolution thereof that was still very similar or a radical new idea. Nod. Which is why now's the time for honest feedback, not 'wait and see.' Which is 'dialing back from 4e,' yes. By definition, you reach back to the past and average out the advances the game has made, you have something dailed back. First you say it's absolutely false, then you re-phrase it. I do. That's why my posts come off as so negative. Because 5e is in a pretty sorry state right now. That's to be expected, it's in development and should improve as that process continues. I can't give it credit for that improvement until it's happened, though. Well, you're wrong. I may be cynical, but I'm a reallist and I am making constructive criticisms of 5e. They may not be truths you (or the designers) want to hear, but they're more valuable than the gushing of yes-men if they can be stomached. Request denied. I will continue to tell the unvarnished truth about 5e. No spin. No credit for vaporware. No wait and see. Good luck with that. It didn't help much when we tried to defend 4e from the constant torrent of lies and negativity of the edition war. [/QUOTE]

Verification