Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dr. Zoom" data-source="post: 356584" data-attributes="member: 409">I would say a double move is about right.&nbsp; Running certainly does not seem to be the same as wandering away.&nbsp; The character is confused and simply &quot;walks&quot; away, as if disinterested.&nbsp; That is how I handled it the last time my group encountered a gibbering mouther.The confused character wanders away from combat for one minute (10 rounds).&nbsp; It would more or less be straight away, although the character would follow the ally ways, streets, or corridors if they turned.&nbsp; You might roll randomly if more than one direction presented itself, or just leave it up to the character's choice.Yes, but I would allow a character to avoid AoO's if at all possible.&nbsp; Also note that if attacked, the confused character will attack their attacker on their next round.No.&nbsp; When the duration of the spell ends, so does the confusion effect (PH, page 150, Duration).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dr. Zoom, post: 356584, member: 409"] I would say a double move is about right. Running certainly does not seem to be the same as wandering away. The character is confused and simply "walks" away, as if disinterested. That is how I handled it the last time my group encountered a gibbering mouther. The confused character wanders away from combat for one minute (10 rounds). It would more or less be straight away, although the character would follow the ally ways, streets, or corridors if they turned. You might roll randomly if more than one direction presented itself, or just leave it up to the character's choice. Yes, but I would allow a character to avoid AoO's if at all possible. Also note that if attacked, the confused character will attack their attacker on their next round. No. When the duration of the spell ends, so does the confusion effect (PH, page 150, Duration). [/QUOTE]

Verification