Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8031133" data-attributes="member: 6987520">Sure, costing &quot;double movement&quot; means it is always double movement. Saying it is difficult terrain means it cost twice as much, but there are features that make it so you ignore that additional cost.My point was the OP's DM might be ruling it is just &quot;double movement&quot; and not difficult terrain, thus you can't get rid of that additional movement penalty. I don't know how their DM runs it, but if it is always &quot;double movement&quot;, it is a house-rule since the features to stop difficult terrain won't help. If, however, the OP used that term to express the effect of the DM's imposing difficult terrain (as you seem to do), then it isn't a house-rule.So, yes, there is a difference because it depends on if that movement penalty for difficult terrain can be mitigated by features that ignore difficult terrain.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8031133, member: 6987520"] Sure, costing "double movement" means it is always double movement. Saying it is difficult terrain means it cost twice as much, [I]but[/I] there are features that make it so you ignore that additional cost. My point was the OP's DM might be ruling it is just "double movement" and not difficult terrain, thus you can't get rid of that additional movement penalty. I don't know how their DM runs it, but if it is always "double movement", it is a house-rule since the features to stop difficult terrain won't help. If, however, the OP used that term to express the effect of the DM's imposing difficult terrain (as you seem to do), then it isn't a house-rule. So, yes, there is a difference because it depends on if that movement penalty for difficult terrain can be mitigated by features that ignore difficult terrain. [/QUOTE]

Verification