Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Question on fantasy races
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ariosto" data-source="post: 5082160" data-attributes="member: 80487"><p>I think one problem is that people so often come across the stuff of fantastic tales when it has already been uprooted and laid on a slab.</p><p></p><p>Dwarves and Elves and so on did not appear in D&D as "standard fantasy". Arneson and Gygax, Kuntz and Ward and Moldvay, had read not only Tolkien but also (among them) Poul Anderson, and Dunsany, and deCamp and Pratt, and Mallory, and T.H. White, and the Brothers Grimm, probably E. Nesbit and possibly Spenser; at least one (Moldvay) took an interest in the visionary poetry of William Blake.</p><p></p><p>They had read at least a bit of Greek myths and Scandinavian sagas, Celtic hero-cycles and Germanic and Slavic fairy tales, the Kalevala and the Thousand Nights and a Night.</p><p></p><p>On top of that were countless more modern stories of fantastic adventure in hidden reaches of the world or on distant planets.</p><p></p><p>There simply <strong>was no such thing</strong> as "standard fantasy" in the early 1970s. There was not even such a clear division between fantasy and science fiction as some D&Ders cleave to today. The very same works by such writers as Andre Norton and Marion Zimmer Bradley were marketed first under one 'genre' label and then under the other.</p><p></p><p>I do not mean to suggest that their reading was exhaustive or scholarly, or that it was dominated by hoary classics.</p><p></p><p>I do mean to suggest that what they brought to the game was what <em>already fueled their imaginations</em>, what had deep resonance because it had struck a chord in the first place, what was significant because there were meanings for it to signify.</p><p></p><p>To take up materials with which one has no such relationship, out of some notion of an Official Fantasyland established by Committee, does not seem to me at all what the pioneers of D&D meant to encourage. A fantasist's work of world-building is not only easier but <em>better</em> for being built of whatever lives and breathes in his or her own dreams, whatever lurks and stalks in his or her own nightmares.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ariosto, post: 5082160, member: 80487"] I think one problem is that people so often come across the stuff of fantastic tales when it has already been uprooted and laid on a slab. Dwarves and Elves and so on did not appear in D&D as "standard fantasy". Arneson and Gygax, Kuntz and Ward and Moldvay, had read not only Tolkien but also (among them) Poul Anderson, and Dunsany, and deCamp and Pratt, and Mallory, and T.H. White, and the Brothers Grimm, probably E. Nesbit and possibly Spenser; at least one (Moldvay) took an interest in the visionary poetry of William Blake. They had read at least a bit of Greek myths and Scandinavian sagas, Celtic hero-cycles and Germanic and Slavic fairy tales, the Kalevala and the Thousand Nights and a Night. On top of that were countless more modern stories of fantastic adventure in hidden reaches of the world or on distant planets. There simply [B]was no such thing[/B] as "standard fantasy" in the early 1970s. There was not even such a clear division between fantasy and science fiction as some D&Ders cleave to today. The very same works by such writers as Andre Norton and Marion Zimmer Bradley were marketed first under one 'genre' label and then under the other. I do not mean to suggest that their reading was exhaustive or scholarly, or that it was dominated by hoary classics. I do mean to suggest that what they brought to the game was what [I]already fueled their imaginations[/I], what had deep resonance because it had struck a chord in the first place, what was significant because there were meanings for it to signify. To take up materials with which one has no such relationship, out of some notion of an Official Fantasyland established by Committee, does not seem to me at all what the pioneers of D&D meant to encourage. A fantasist's work of world-building is not only easier but [I]better[/I] for being built of whatever lives and breathes in his or her own dreams, whatever lurks and stalks in his or her own nightmares. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Question on fantasy races
Top