Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question regarding Copu de Gras and ray spells
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimlock" data-source="post: 5614151" data-attributes="member: 6674931"><p>I know what the question is. I was simply answering to you, so as to clarify that while holding a charge all the melee-type actions are entirely possible and covered by RAW.</p><p></p><p>Not that you said otherwise, I'm just making the differentiation between attacking with the charge and attacking while casting the spell.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I forgot about that clarification, still what you say is not entirely true.</p><p></p><p>I understand that the spell's description says: "Casting time: 1 standard action", (one which is still subject to AoOs) still there is nowhere written that the touch attack is the "free action" of the process.</p><p></p><p>The entire process is a standard action, a quite unique one actually that allows you to split the two sub-actions, and let's you combine them as you wish with the move action.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: Olive">Touch Spells in Combat</span></p><p><span style="color: Olive">Many spells have a range of touch. To use these spells, you cast the spell and then touch the subject, either in the same round or any time later. In the same round that you cast the spell, you may also touch (or attempt to touch) the target. You may take your move before casting the spell, after touching the target, or between casting the spell and touching the target. You can automatically touch one friend or use the spell on yourself, but to touch an opponent, you must succeed on an attack roll.</span></p><p><span style="color: Olive"></span></p><p></p><p>IMO, again this only shows how minor the casting time of those spells is. I cannot think of the touch attack as being the "minor action" (it's a normal attack, without penalties, that happens during one's round). I 'd probably consider the casting as being the "minor action" of the entire process.</p><p></p><p>Look at it this way: </p><p>The wizard speaks a word (minor sub-standard action), and his hand suddenly flashes with magical energy etc etc... Then he moves close to the enemy (move action) and attacks (major sub-standard action) while taking all the time and the effort to make that single attack. Honestly, I do not see those sub actions being the other way around.</p><p></p><p>This is why I take it that it is possible to do a CDG with a touch attack spell. The whole process just turns from a standard action into a full round action. (In that case, splitting the action is not possible, one has to be standing next to the victim, only 5' are allowed before and after)</p><p></p><p>Again this might not be clear by RAW, but I totally see it as being possible within the concept of those rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimlock, post: 5614151, member: 6674931"] I know what the question is. I was simply answering to you, so as to clarify that while holding a charge all the melee-type actions are entirely possible and covered by RAW. Not that you said otherwise, I'm just making the differentiation between attacking with the charge and attacking while casting the spell. I forgot about that clarification, still what you say is not entirely true. I understand that the spell's description says: "Casting time: 1 standard action", (one which is still subject to AoOs) still there is nowhere written that the touch attack is the "free action" of the process. The entire process is a standard action, a quite unique one actually that allows you to split the two sub-actions, and let's you combine them as you wish with the move action. [COLOR="Olive"]Touch Spells in Combat Many spells have a range of touch. To use these spells, you cast the spell and then touch the subject, either in the same round or any time later. In the same round that you cast the spell, you may also touch (or attempt to touch) the target. You may take your move before casting the spell, after touching the target, or between casting the spell and touching the target. You can automatically touch one friend or use the spell on yourself, but to touch an opponent, you must succeed on an attack roll. [/COLOR] IMO, again this only shows how minor the casting time of those spells is. I cannot think of the touch attack as being the "minor action" (it's a normal attack, without penalties, that happens during one's round). I 'd probably consider the casting as being the "minor action" of the entire process. Look at it this way: The wizard speaks a word (minor sub-standard action), and his hand suddenly flashes with magical energy etc etc... Then he moves close to the enemy (move action) and attacks (major sub-standard action) while taking all the time and the effort to make that single attack. Honestly, I do not see those sub actions being the other way around. This is why I take it that it is possible to do a CDG with a touch attack spell. The whole process just turns from a standard action into a full round action. (In that case, splitting the action is not possible, one has to be standing next to the victim, only 5' are allowed before and after) Again this might not be clear by RAW, but I totally see it as being possible within the concept of those rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Question regarding Copu de Gras and ray spells
Top