Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sword-dancer" data-source="post: 186505" data-attributes="member: 1491">SHARK Since G N E isn`t a point of view in D&D but an absolute.He is evil rotten to the core a .Childmurder, Childslayer, and thats it.What if it would be dwarfs or elven children, would that made a difference.The MM evil of Hobgoblis is the evil of society not the inbred evil of fiends.Was the massacre of Jerusalem 1.crusade good, righteouss? NoWas the burning of Persepolis good and honorable No.Should good not judge himself on a higher standard than evil.The annihilating of boiers through the romans good?If good uses the same methods as evil what´s the difference„I wouldn`t catch an orc with an lie“ Faramir warmaster of Gondor.It gives a borderline in war what between warriors and murders.Maybe the Druid wasn`t an combat character, remember druids are often advisors healers, loremasters but not warriors per se.And I wouldn`t cast spells for every other skirmish.A warrior could strike every time the day, a caster could only cast so oftenWould i as a warrior want somebody on my heels as a burden to protect if he could  not fight(weapons or spells)Second he was in reserve, outlook, something very useful in battle,  .Third woud a fighter get mad because a thief wasn`t in the thick of battle.As a charcter I would banish him from the party at least.But more reasonably execute him on the spot or bring him to justice, and in the wilderness justice means the party.Even if he was aburden on the party? It would be the decision of the party to threw him out.UlrickThe difference in Independent day was the Mothership was a military unit, the aliens risked their own civilians by  taking them on board.</blockquote>

Verification