Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questionable morals - PC's killing children
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="med stud" data-source="post: 187210" data-attributes="member: 1211"><p>There are two answers for this as I know of real life. One is the morally absolutistic view that humans are created by God (or whatever) and therefore are Holy. Killing is forbidden in holy writing X, therefore we shouldnt kill.</p><p></p><p>The other answer is that with increased sentience comes increased levels of potential suffering. A plant is unable to suffer; you can damage it, but you cant (probably) make it suffer. A low animal, like a worm, you can make suffer physically but probably dont mentally (since the mental capacity of a worm is pretty limited). If we go up on the scale we find mammals, who are able to feel emotions like joy and fear. Those animals can suffer physically and mentally. If we go up the ladder again, we find sentient beings, who can be hurt terribly mentally, with the use of imagination and so on.</p><p>What does this explanation tell? Nothing without premises. But if we put in a premise, like hurting is bad, we come to the conclusion that is worse hurting a sentient being than a plant. This is the morally relativistic point of view, which often is about maximising happiness or minimizing suffering.</p><p></p><p>These explanations can be used well in D&D to judge an action. Let's say that the morally absolutic view says that killing hobgoblins is not wrong, it is a Neutral action. If it says that killing all children is wrong, then it is Evil. Pretty easy.</p><p></p><p>By using the relative moral, we have to compare the consequences of letting the children live; what will happen to the total level of "happiness" in the world? On the minus side we have the loss of Happiness from the children, and what's on the plus side is another matter, depending on how you view hobgoblins in your game.</p><p></p><p>Hope Im not incohorent, Im pretty tired as Im writing this <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="med stud, post: 187210, member: 1211"] There are two answers for this as I know of real life. One is the morally absolutistic view that humans are created by God (or whatever) and therefore are Holy. Killing is forbidden in holy writing X, therefore we shouldnt kill. The other answer is that with increased sentience comes increased levels of potential suffering. A plant is unable to suffer; you can damage it, but you cant (probably) make it suffer. A low animal, like a worm, you can make suffer physically but probably dont mentally (since the mental capacity of a worm is pretty limited). If we go up on the scale we find mammals, who are able to feel emotions like joy and fear. Those animals can suffer physically and mentally. If we go up the ladder again, we find sentient beings, who can be hurt terribly mentally, with the use of imagination and so on. What does this explanation tell? Nothing without premises. But if we put in a premise, like hurting is bad, we come to the conclusion that is worse hurting a sentient being than a plant. This is the morally relativistic point of view, which often is about maximising happiness or minimizing suffering. These explanations can be used well in D&D to judge an action. Let's say that the morally absolutic view says that killing hobgoblins is not wrong, it is a Neutral action. If it says that killing all children is wrong, then it is Evil. Pretty easy. By using the relative moral, we have to compare the consequences of letting the children live; what will happen to the total level of "happiness" in the world? On the minus side we have the loss of Happiness from the children, and what's on the plus side is another matter, depending on how you view hobgoblins in your game. Hope Im not incohorent, Im pretty tired as Im writing this ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questionable morals - PC's killing children
Top