Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questioning Dangerous Prisoners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chrisling" data-source="post: 405464" data-attributes="member: 6816"><p><strong>Re: Re: Cavalier Attitudes About Torture and Mutilation</strong></p><p></p><p>Elder-Basilisk,</p><p></p><p>LOL. I think most people believe in evil, I just think most people lack the conviction to say it because, y'know, it's easy to make fun of them. I'm thick skinned.</p><p></p><p>Your point about the Roman Empire is well taken. However, in the situations about which I am talking, the PCs weren't acting under any legal authority in the first place; in fact, sometimes they were the criminals fleeing a corrupt government.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, I was using the Geneva Convention as a standard of morality. Clearly, it does not apply to most D&D games, as there is no Geneva in which to convene and the society was far more primitive in most games.</p><p></p><p>However, your statement that the Geneva Convention applies only to uniformed soldiers is incorrect. The statement that has been bandied about militias needing a sign recognizable at a distance is only a small fraction of Part 1, Article 4 of the Convention. Other people covered by the convention include, "Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war" and "Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces" -- and no mention is made in that article of whether they should have uniforms or not.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, if someone is taken in battle -- regardless of them having a uniform or not -- they're to be treated as if the Convention applies to them until such a time as they've been subjected to a competent tribunal to determine their status. Or, to quote Part 1, Article 5: "Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal. "</p><p></p><p>It is totally true that the Geneva Convention only applies amongst signators, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chrisling, post: 405464, member: 6816"] [b]Re: Re: Cavalier Attitudes About Torture and Mutilation[/b] Elder-Basilisk, LOL. I think most people believe in evil, I just think most people lack the conviction to say it because, y'know, it's easy to make fun of them. I'm thick skinned. Your point about the Roman Empire is well taken. However, in the situations about which I am talking, the PCs weren't acting under any legal authority in the first place; in fact, sometimes they were the criminals fleeing a corrupt government. Additionally, I was using the Geneva Convention as a standard of morality. Clearly, it does not apply to most D&D games, as there is no Geneva in which to convene and the society was far more primitive in most games. However, your statement that the Geneva Convention applies only to uniformed soldiers is incorrect. The statement that has been bandied about militias needing a sign recognizable at a distance is only a small fraction of Part 1, Article 4 of the Convention. Other people covered by the convention include, "Inhabitants of a non-occupied territory, who on the approach of the enemy spontaneously take up arms to resist the invading forces, without having had time to form themselves into regular armed units, provided they carry arms openly and respect the laws and customs of war" and "Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces" -- and no mention is made in that article of whether they should have uniforms or not. Furthermore, if someone is taken in battle -- regardless of them having a uniform or not -- they're to be treated as if the Convention applies to them until such a time as they've been subjected to a competent tribunal to determine their status. Or, to quote Part 1, Article 5: "Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal. " It is totally true that the Geneva Convention only applies amongst signators, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questioning Dangerous Prisoners
Top