Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="diaglo" data-source="post: 731167" data-attributes="member: 2885">of course, you know it would be Original D&D (1974).<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> but hypothetically i would do a lot of research many sessions ahead of time. like you are doing.looking at how other abilities turned to feats work in comparison to the campaign.start with the ranger's track ability. it is a general feat.now what about turning various domain abilities from the cleric into feats? some work, like, weapon prof.others may not. death touch (considering how many people attacked the harm spell <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes    :rolleyes:"  data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />  )what about PrC abilities? would you allow the assassin's study and kill attack without a huge prereq? or the +2 Dex and init from one of the domain feats in DoF?i could see adding some, but it has to be weighed heavily against the campaign.in my ideal campaign, magic is rare. and magic-users even rarer.counterspelling feats may be wasted on the low levels, for the few PCs that took them. it would be a big disappointment to the player if he never got the chance to use them.</blockquote>

Verification