Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questions about Flails, Maces & Morningstars book
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sjmiller" data-source="post: 2786556" data-attributes="member: 17262"><p>Since there's not a huge amount of traffic on the official boards, I thought I would ask this here, so as to get the thoughts and opinions of you fine folk on these questions.</p><p></p><p>I’ve been reading through <em>E.N. Arsenal – Flails, Maces & MorningStars</em>, and I am a bit confused by some of the descriptions (or lack thereof). Under the Variants section there is a weapon called a <strong><em>Flail-Mace</em></strong>. The description of the weapon, in part, says:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The bold parts are what have me confused. I’ve tried to work this out in my head, and even tried to figure it out using some paper cutouts. Geometry seems to tell me that this description is not possible. I can see it working if the heads were diamond-shaped, triangle-shaped, or even if the outer face was rounded and each head formed a quarter of a sphere. Am I missing something here, or is the description just not practical?</p><p></p><p>I’ll skip over the <strong><em>Godentag</em></strong>, since I could spend quite some time on this. Let’s just say that the description given doesn’t match any of the archeological evidence I have seen for the weapon.</p><p></p><p>The <strong><em>King’s Walking Stick</em></strong> has me rather baffled. There seems to be no description of this at all! This is a weapon that, more than any of the others, needs a description and illustration to make it useful. Where do the pistols fit into this thing? How many pistols are there? How are they loaded?</p><p></p><p>Speaking of loading, these pistols must have some gigantic barrels if the ammunition information means anything. It says that a bag of lead shot weighs 5 pounds, and that there are 10 round per bag. That means they weigh about half a pound per shot. Since lead runs at about 0.41 pounds per cubic inch, that means each round is close to a cubic inch in size. That means the caliber of the round is, well, 1.00, and the biggest caliber musket ball I could find was in the .70 to .75 range. If the round is 1.00 caliber, that means the inside diameter of the barrel is 1 inch! That’s huge! That qualifies it as a small cannon, or possibly a mortar. It is not something one would want to hold in their hand and shoot. Unless, of course, they want to get rid of that hand and arm.</p><p></p><p>The <strong><em>Mace-Axe</em></strong> isn’t quite as confusing, but I want to make sure I am seeing this right. The weapon description says:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, am I right in thinking that it looks rather like a ball with two axe-heads sticking out of it? So, to effectively use the mace aspect of the weapon one would turn the weapon so that you hit with the flat of the blade and the ball as well, right? Does this make sense?</p><p></p><p>I am trying really hard to like this book, but there are aspects like those described above that are making that a difficult task.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sjmiller, post: 2786556, member: 17262"] Since there's not a huge amount of traffic on the official boards, I thought I would ask this here, so as to get the thoughts and opinions of you fine folk on these questions. I’ve been reading through [I]E.N. Arsenal – Flails, Maces & MorningStars[/I], and I am a bit confused by some of the descriptions (or lack thereof). Under the Variants section there is a weapon called a [b][I]Flail-Mace[/I][/b][I][/I]. The description of the weapon, in part, says: The bold parts are what have me confused. I’ve tried to work this out in my head, and even tried to figure it out using some paper cutouts. Geometry seems to tell me that this description is not possible. I can see it working if the heads were diamond-shaped, triangle-shaped, or even if the outer face was rounded and each head formed a quarter of a sphere. Am I missing something here, or is the description just not practical? I’ll skip over the [b][I]Godentag[/I][/b][I][/I], since I could spend quite some time on this. Let’s just say that the description given doesn’t match any of the archeological evidence I have seen for the weapon. The [b][I]King’s Walking Stick[/I][/b][I][/I] has me rather baffled. There seems to be no description of this at all! This is a weapon that, more than any of the others, needs a description and illustration to make it useful. Where do the pistols fit into this thing? How many pistols are there? How are they loaded? Speaking of loading, these pistols must have some gigantic barrels if the ammunition information means anything. It says that a bag of lead shot weighs 5 pounds, and that there are 10 round per bag. That means they weigh about half a pound per shot. Since lead runs at about 0.41 pounds per cubic inch, that means each round is close to a cubic inch in size. That means the caliber of the round is, well, 1.00, and the biggest caliber musket ball I could find was in the .70 to .75 range. If the round is 1.00 caliber, that means the inside diameter of the barrel is 1 inch! That’s huge! That qualifies it as a small cannon, or possibly a mortar. It is not something one would want to hold in their hand and shoot. Unless, of course, they want to get rid of that hand and arm. The [b][I]Mace-Axe[/I][/b][I][/I] isn’t quite as confusing, but I want to make sure I am seeing this right. The weapon description says: Now, am I right in thinking that it looks rather like a ball with two axe-heads sticking out of it? So, to effectively use the mace aspect of the weapon one would turn the weapon so that you hit with the flat of the blade and the ball as well, right? Does this make sense? I am trying really hard to like this book, but there are aspects like those described above that are making that a difficult task. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questions about Flails, Maces & Morningstars book
Top