Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questions about OGL...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flynn" data-source="post: 412108" data-attributes="member: 1836"><p><strong>Another OGL Question</strong></p><p></p><p>I have a question regarding the Open Gaming License (OGL). As it deals with copyright and the OGL, I realize that some may feel that this is a touchy subject. If so, I apologize, but I only ask for the sake of curiosity, not in any sense of ill will.</p><p></p><p>As we all know, there's a lot of non-Open Game Content (OGC) to be found in the various WOTC sourcebooks, and people are frequently getting into trouble over using this content without Wizards' permission. I know, from reading several heated discussions on this and other lists, that WOTC cannot copyright game mechanics. I also have read that if a sufficient amount of the text is changed, the basic idea or concept behind a game mechanic can still be communicated without violating the copyright that Wizards has on the material. It would appear logical (doesn't mean it actually works this way, though) that a publisher could put together a quick PDF to post on their website that gives the basic feats, spells, classes, monsters, prestige classes, magic items, or what-have-you, from any on these non-OGC sourcebooks, with sufficient changes to avoid violating copyright while still preserving the mechanics, and then declare their content to be OGC, so that the sourcebook materials become available to all other publishers, using the OGC names and text, of course. For example, the feat Spellcasting Prodigy becomes the OGC feat Innate Spellcaster, with appropriate text that supports the same basic functionality, game mechanically.</p><p></p><p>While it would seem logical, it obviously doesn't work this way, or someone would have done so already. After all, having your company's name in section 15 of everyone else's OGL would have to be good advertising, at least on some level.</p><p></p><p>So here's the question: I know it doesn't work, but why? Is it legal? Or is it simply the spirit of cooperation that exists between D20 publishers and WOTC?</p><p></p><p>Just curious,</p><p>Flynn</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flynn, post: 412108, member: 1836"] [b]Another OGL Question[/b] I have a question regarding the Open Gaming License (OGL). As it deals with copyright and the OGL, I realize that some may feel that this is a touchy subject. If so, I apologize, but I only ask for the sake of curiosity, not in any sense of ill will. As we all know, there's a lot of non-Open Game Content (OGC) to be found in the various WOTC sourcebooks, and people are frequently getting into trouble over using this content without Wizards' permission. I know, from reading several heated discussions on this and other lists, that WOTC cannot copyright game mechanics. I also have read that if a sufficient amount of the text is changed, the basic idea or concept behind a game mechanic can still be communicated without violating the copyright that Wizards has on the material. It would appear logical (doesn't mean it actually works this way, though) that a publisher could put together a quick PDF to post on their website that gives the basic feats, spells, classes, monsters, prestige classes, magic items, or what-have-you, from any on these non-OGC sourcebooks, with sufficient changes to avoid violating copyright while still preserving the mechanics, and then declare their content to be OGC, so that the sourcebook materials become available to all other publishers, using the OGC names and text, of course. For example, the feat Spellcasting Prodigy becomes the OGC feat Innate Spellcaster, with appropriate text that supports the same basic functionality, game mechanically. While it would seem logical, it obviously doesn't work this way, or someone would have done so already. After all, having your company's name in section 15 of everyone else's OGL would have to be good advertising, at least on some level. So here's the question: I know it doesn't work, but why? Is it legal? Or is it simply the spirit of cooperation that exists between D20 publishers and WOTC? Just curious, Flynn [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Questions about OGL...
Top