Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Questions about Pearl of Power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7115239" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I would go further. It's fairly clear that the Pearl is intended to cost an action. Use activation is not inherently without an activation cost. The description of use activation in the SRD makes this clear. </p><p></p><p>In general, a use activated item only takes no action to use if it already requires some other action to use it. That is to say a use activated item either requires a standard action or it requires no additional action beyond the one implied by its use. If the use activated item does not require an explicit usage action to use it (swinging a sword, quaffing a potion, putting on a ring), then the use activated item usually requires a standard action to use. We'd generally expect in the Pearl of Power's case that it would specify no action is required to activate it if that were the case, but instead it specifies (with admittedly and unhappily technical language) that a command is required. </p><p></p><p>However untechnical the wording, I think it is obviously intended from the wording for the Pearl of Power to require a standard action along with a conscious mental command to use it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not that it matters, but personally I think it's absurd that spell damage ignores DR in the first place. But that's a different situation. You can't know if the designer of crystal shard knew that spell damage bypassed DR and intended the effect. I think Pearl of Power is obviously using an action within the rules as written and wouldn't bow to a rules lawyer with a different interpretation. But with the crystal shard case, the rules lawyer is obviously correct assuming we've agreed that Psionic powers adhere to the rules for spells unless otherwise stated (psionic-magic transparency). The rules may be ill-considered, but at least they are clear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7115239, member: 4937"] I would go further. It's fairly clear that the Pearl is intended to cost an action. Use activation is not inherently without an activation cost. The description of use activation in the SRD makes this clear. In general, a use activated item only takes no action to use if it already requires some other action to use it. That is to say a use activated item either requires a standard action or it requires no additional action beyond the one implied by its use. If the use activated item does not require an explicit usage action to use it (swinging a sword, quaffing a potion, putting on a ring), then the use activated item usually requires a standard action to use. We'd generally expect in the Pearl of Power's case that it would specify no action is required to activate it if that were the case, but instead it specifies (with admittedly and unhappily technical language) that a command is required. However untechnical the wording, I think it is obviously intended from the wording for the Pearl of Power to require a standard action along with a conscious mental command to use it. Not that it matters, but personally I think it's absurd that spell damage ignores DR in the first place. But that's a different situation. You can't know if the designer of crystal shard knew that spell damage bypassed DR and intended the effect. I think Pearl of Power is obviously using an action within the rules as written and wouldn't bow to a rules lawyer with a different interpretation. But with the crystal shard case, the rules lawyer is obviously correct assuming we've agreed that Psionic powers adhere to the rules for spells unless otherwise stated (psionic-magic transparency). The rules may be ill-considered, but at least they are clear. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Questions about Pearl of Power
Top