Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Questions about the Speed of Light
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Turanil" data-source="post: 2397744" data-attributes="member: 9646"><p>As most people in our western society, and probably everyone on these boards, I know that if a starship could travel at a speed close to that of light, time would pass much slower for it that it would pass for things immobile (or very slow). So, the starship for instance would travel a distance of two light years in three months of its own time, while two years passed on the planet it left (and the one it reaches).</p><p></p><p>But now comes the things on which I would like to be enlightened ( <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> ):</p><p></p><p>1) If a thing would travel at exactly 100% the speed of light (despite it is theoretically impossible and would require infinite energy expenditure), would time slow so much as to stop altogether, meaning the starship ceases to age if even for only one nanosecond? Or does time still pass at the speed of light. (I hope my question is comprehensible)</p><p></p><p>Then, the related questions:</p><p></p><p>2) Supposing time still pass when at 100% the speed of light. Inside the starship that travels at 100% light speed, someone has to go from the back of the starship to the front. So, with regard to things immobile outside of the starship, he is moving slightly faster than the speed of light; so would it be impossible to walk forward in the starship?</p><p></p><p>3) Now, suppose time ceases to pass at exactly 100% of the speed of light. Fact is, a photon begins its travel from a star instantaneously at the speed of light; and then reaches a distant planet still at 100% of the speed of light. Between the moment when the photon was emited by the star, and the moment it reaches a planet, says that 5 years of local time have passed on said planet. However, since the photon travels at 100% light speed, no time at all passed for the photon. If indeed that is the case, at time 0 the photon is both at its point of departure and point of arrival 5 light-years-distance away. So the photon is simulateously at the same moment everywhere on the trajectory. Therefore, it could be said that subjectively the photon doesn't move at all, it exists in all places at the same moment. My question is that if I interpret things rightly, I wonder if there is not something extremely important lying there. Something about the nature of reality, of space and time itself, etc.</p><p></p><p>So, any comment from those with scientific backgrounds on ENworld?</p><p></p><p>Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Turanil, post: 2397744, member: 9646"] As most people in our western society, and probably everyone on these boards, I know that if a starship could travel at a speed close to that of light, time would pass much slower for it that it would pass for things immobile (or very slow). So, the starship for instance would travel a distance of two light years in three months of its own time, while two years passed on the planet it left (and the one it reaches). But now comes the things on which I would like to be enlightened ( :D ): 1) If a thing would travel at exactly 100% the speed of light (despite it is theoretically impossible and would require infinite energy expenditure), would time slow so much as to stop altogether, meaning the starship ceases to age if even for only one nanosecond? Or does time still pass at the speed of light. (I hope my question is comprehensible) Then, the related questions: 2) Supposing time still pass when at 100% the speed of light. Inside the starship that travels at 100% light speed, someone has to go from the back of the starship to the front. So, with regard to things immobile outside of the starship, he is moving slightly faster than the speed of light; so would it be impossible to walk forward in the starship? 3) Now, suppose time ceases to pass at exactly 100% of the speed of light. Fact is, a photon begins its travel from a star instantaneously at the speed of light; and then reaches a distant planet still at 100% of the speed of light. Between the moment when the photon was emited by the star, and the moment it reaches a planet, says that 5 years of local time have passed on said planet. However, since the photon travels at 100% light speed, no time at all passed for the photon. If indeed that is the case, at time 0 the photon is both at its point of departure and point of arrival 5 light-years-distance away. So the photon is simulateously at the same moment everywhere on the trajectory. Therefore, it could be said that subjectively the photon doesn't move at all, it exists in all places at the same moment. My question is that if I interpret things rightly, I wonder if there is not something extremely important lying there. Something about the nature of reality, of space and time itself, etc. So, any comment from those with scientific backgrounds on ENworld? Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Questions about the Speed of Light
Top