Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Primitive Screwhead" data-source="post: 3797958" data-attributes="member: 20805">I agree its a long, difficult discussion. My reading, and use in play, is based on the same thing I use for everything else. You threaten an area with melee weapons you had readied for use during your last turn.This means a double-weapon used for a single 2h-attack only has that side of the weapon readied and available for AoO.If you take the full attack option and accept the -2 penatly to hit for TWF, then you can use either side of the weapon for an AoO.Bascially its Patryn's option #1 above <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Yes I know, the FAQ about armored spikes disagree with me.... or more correctly I disagree with it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />The only kink this interpretation leaves is those annoying characters with Combat Reflexes that carry quarterstaffs....   <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid    :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /></blockquote>