Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Questions Regarding Bo9S Maneuvers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HoboGod" data-source="post: 5226018" data-attributes="member: 90920"><p>Okay, I'm not sure if this is because it's nearly 6am or because I've been looking for a straight answer since 2am, but I'm needing clarification, here. The vocabulary is really screwing me up.</p><p></p><p>First question. This question regards Crusader. It says, "You can ready all five maneuvers you know...." Wait, what? This works like a spell, so does "ready"="prepare" and I can ready one move five times, thusly eliminating Crusader randomness? If not, okay. What about the second word? I CAN ready all five? Does that mean I can choose not to and only ready two maneuvers? Again, doesn't this eliminate Crusader randomness?</p><p></p><p>Second Question. This question regards initiation time. Now, I'm assuming that initiation time means that's the time it takes for me to focus long enough to use this ability. If the initiation time is a full-round action, I spend a full-round action doing nothing and next turn I get to use what I initiated, is that right?</p><p></p><p>Third Question. This question regards conflicting vocabulary. Crusader's Strike says, "As part of initiating this strike, you must..." and Divine Surge says, "As part of this maneuver, you make...." Same page, nearly identical requirements, different vocabulary, it seems to switch off between these two ways of starting a description. What's happening here? Does one suggest you get an attack action during the initiation, OR that the initiation action is a melee attack which deals no damage but the bonus itself, OR that it's just two writers conflicting flavor text, OR something else entirely?</p><p></p><p>If any of these questions can't be answered with quotes and paraphrases, I'll gladly take opinions and houserules. I'm trying to play a Crusader, but I'm not trying to powergame. I want to introduce this book for general use when I DM, but I can't if I can't prove picking a something out of this book is an irrelevant RPing decision, not a competitive advantage. To anyone willing to help, thank you, thank you, thank you!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HoboGod, post: 5226018, member: 90920"] Okay, I'm not sure if this is because it's nearly 6am or because I've been looking for a straight answer since 2am, but I'm needing clarification, here. The vocabulary is really screwing me up. First question. This question regards Crusader. It says, "You can ready all five maneuvers you know...." Wait, what? This works like a spell, so does "ready"="prepare" and I can ready one move five times, thusly eliminating Crusader randomness? If not, okay. What about the second word? I CAN ready all five? Does that mean I can choose not to and only ready two maneuvers? Again, doesn't this eliminate Crusader randomness? Second Question. This question regards initiation time. Now, I'm assuming that initiation time means that's the time it takes for me to focus long enough to use this ability. If the initiation time is a full-round action, I spend a full-round action doing nothing and next turn I get to use what I initiated, is that right? Third Question. This question regards conflicting vocabulary. Crusader's Strike says, "As part of initiating this strike, you must..." and Divine Surge says, "As part of this maneuver, you make...." Same page, nearly identical requirements, different vocabulary, it seems to switch off between these two ways of starting a description. What's happening here? Does one suggest you get an attack action during the initiation, OR that the initiation action is a melee attack which deals no damage but the bonus itself, OR that it's just two writers conflicting flavor text, OR something else entirely? If any of these questions can't be answered with quotes and paraphrases, I'll gladly take opinions and houserules. I'm trying to play a Crusader, but I'm not trying to powergame. I want to introduce this book for general use when I DM, but I can't if I can't prove picking a something out of this book is an irrelevant RPing decision, not a competitive advantage. To anyone willing to help, thank you, thank you, thank you! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Questions Regarding Bo9S Maneuvers
Top