Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mal Malenkirk" data-source="post: 15505" data-attributes="member: 834">TWF and fighting with a two-handed weapon is very roughly equivalent.&nbsp; If you are very strong it tips toward two-handed.My problem with this situation is that you need 3-4 feat to master TWF and none for two-handed.Obviously for balance purpose TWF should be a little better than using a two-handed weapon.&nbsp; Not 2nd edition better, just a little better.And don't tell me TWF is for rogue.&nbsp; Spending 4 feats to use a two-bladed sword efficiently is clearly a fighter schtick.Easy fix: what I did is allow full strenght bonus on off-hand attack and eliminate the need to select improved TWF.&nbsp; You gain it automatically upon reaching a BAB of +8 if you have TWF.Oh, and I do not want to no how sylvir can have an AC of 33 unarmored and still get two wield two katana efficiently.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mal Malenkirk, post: 15505, member: 834"] TWF and fighting with a two-handed weapon is very roughly equivalent. If you are very strong it tips toward two-handed. My problem with this situation is that you need 3-4 feat to master TWF and none for two-handed. Obviously for balance purpose TWF should be [i]a little[/i] better than using a two-handed weapon. Not [i]2nd edition better[/i], just [i]a little[/i] better. And don't tell me TWF is for rogue. Spending 4 feats to use a two-bladed sword efficiently is clearly a fighter schtick. Easy fix: what I did is allow full strenght bonus on off-hand attack and eliminate the need to select improved TWF. You gain it automatically upon reaching a BAB of +8 if you have TWF. Oh, and I do not want to no how sylvir can have an AC of 33 unarmored and still get two wield two katana efficiently. [/QUOTE]

Verification