Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Quick Question: Attacks of Op in the Suprise Round
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 3648799" data-attributes="member: 3929"><p>Unless I am very much mistaken, as defined by the rules, an AoO is not an action. It is not a free action, an immediate action, a swift action, a full-round action, a standard action, a move equivalent action, or a 1 round action. I think that's all of them.</p><p></p><p>There is a difference between acting (doing anything at all, including day-dreaming) and performing a rule-defined action.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Seeing it or not is not in question. If you have an enemy that jumps out of the bushes at you and attacks, barring any method of remaining concealed throughout the attack, you see it. A panther that leaps from the bushes and attacks? Everyone sees it. A trap that fires spears at you? Everyone sees them.</p><p></p><p>What the surprise round functionally determines is how quickly you are able to react to what you see (aware vs unaware). You failed the spot check to see the orc throw his spear; this does not mean that you are unaware that your barbarian friend has been run through and is now screaming horribly in pain. You simply take longer to gather your wits about you and react to the situation. An <em>Invisible</em> opponent who attacks and breaks his <em>invisibility</em> no longer requires Spot checks to see; you're all aware of him and yet you still can't act in the surprise round.</p><p></p><p></p><p>...yes? You spent a feat to do this.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So? You spent a feat, your skill points, gave up a shield, and chose your weapon all to be able to get one, maybe two attacks, on one opponent at the beginning of combat. <em>If</em> the enemy closes to melee. If this is a complaint, it's similar to saying someone with a Tower Shield, Combat Expertise and 5 ranks in Tumble has too high an AC. </p><p></p><p>You don't think someone should be able to build a character who has cat-like reflexes? Because really that's what this build is.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You want to be flamed? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /> </p><p></p><p>One question: do you believe the text does not allow a character with Combat Reflexes to make AoO's in the Surprise round, or do you simply dislike the rules that allow a character with Combat Reflexes to make an AoO, and wish it were otherwise?</p><p></p><p></p><p>-----------------------</p><p></p><p>Lastly, to make an AoO, even with Combat Reflexes, you must threaten. To threaten with a weapon, you must wield it. If there is a difference between "wielding a weapon" and "holding a weapon", then it is possible to disallow a character with CR his AoO in the surprise round.</p><p></p><p>If you want to be a RBDM. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felix, post: 3648799, member: 3929"] Unless I am very much mistaken, as defined by the rules, an AoO is not an action. It is not a free action, an immediate action, a swift action, a full-round action, a standard action, a move equivalent action, or a 1 round action. I think that's all of them. There is a difference between acting (doing anything at all, including day-dreaming) and performing a rule-defined action. Seeing it or not is not in question. If you have an enemy that jumps out of the bushes at you and attacks, barring any method of remaining concealed throughout the attack, you see it. A panther that leaps from the bushes and attacks? Everyone sees it. A trap that fires spears at you? Everyone sees them. What the surprise round functionally determines is how quickly you are able to react to what you see (aware vs unaware). You failed the spot check to see the orc throw his spear; this does not mean that you are unaware that your barbarian friend has been run through and is now screaming horribly in pain. You simply take longer to gather your wits about you and react to the situation. An [i]Invisible[/i] opponent who attacks and breaks his [i]invisibility[/i] no longer requires Spot checks to see; you're all aware of him and yet you still can't act in the surprise round. ...yes? You spent a feat to do this. So? You spent a feat, your skill points, gave up a shield, and chose your weapon all to be able to get one, maybe two attacks, on one opponent at the beginning of combat. [i]If[/i] the enemy closes to melee. If this is a complaint, it's similar to saying someone with a Tower Shield, Combat Expertise and 5 ranks in Tumble has too high an AC. You don't think someone should be able to build a character who has cat-like reflexes? Because really that's what this build is. You want to be flamed? :confused: One question: do you believe the text does not allow a character with Combat Reflexes to make AoO's in the Surprise round, or do you simply dislike the rules that allow a character with Combat Reflexes to make an AoO, and wish it were otherwise? ----------------------- Lastly, to make an AoO, even with Combat Reflexes, you must threaten. To threaten with a weapon, you must wield it. If there is a difference between "wielding a weapon" and "holding a weapon", then it is possible to disallow a character with CR his AoO in the surprise round. If you want to be a RBDM. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Quick Question: Attacks of Op in the Suprise Round
Top