Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Slander" data-source="post: 148346" data-attributes="member: 1593">A Monk's Stunning Attack is considered to be the same as Stunning Fist for things that have Stunning Fist as a prereq, but they are not the same thing.Were a Monk to take Stunning Fist, you would keep two seperate pools, one for Stunning Attack and one for Stunning Fist.&nbsp; For a single class monk, this has the net result of giving additional Stunning Attacks per day.&nbsp; For a multi-classed monk (who isn't in a class that simply advances their monk abilities), he would have a number of Stunning Attacks per day at a DC appropriate to his Monk level only.&nbsp; These would never raise again.&nbsp; He would have a number of Stunning Fist attacks per day at a DC appropriate to his character level that would rise as per feat description.That's the way that makes the most sense to me; you don't get any more or any less that you are supposed to.Slander</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Slander, post: 148346, member: 1593"] A Monk's Stunning Attack is considered to be the same as Stunning Fist for things that have Stunning Fist as a prereq, but they are not the same thing. Were a Monk to take Stunning Fist, you would keep two seperate pools, one for Stunning Attack and one for Stunning Fist. For a single class monk, this has the net result of giving additional Stunning Attacks per day. For a multi-classed monk (who isn't in a class that simply advances their monk abilities), he would have a number of Stunning Attacks per day at a DC appropriate to his Monk level only. These would never raise again. He would have a number of Stunning Fist attacks per day at a DC appropriate to his character level that would rise as per feat description. That's the way that makes the most sense to me; you don't get any more or any less that you are supposed to. Slander [/QUOTE]

Verification