Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Quietly Back to the Past (in spirit)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trollwad" data-source="post: 3739090" data-attributes="member: 19187"><p>There are two design essays on the Wizards website that show that the mentality if not the rules of 4e are a bit more old school than 3.5e. </p><p></p><p>The first is called Dungeon Design in 4e. Many grognard types point out that the gigantic stat blocks and obsessive "CR matching" in 3.5E logically culminated in the Delve format and very set piece battles which reduced DM discretion and flexibility -- look at the 3.5e Ravenloft vs. its 1e predecessor. Many classic 1e modules such as the ship battle in Saltmarsh or the Forgotten Temple of Tharizdun have flowing multi-room, multi-stage battles. This essay implicitly criticizes 3.5e for its static nature and its inability to have flexible plans of attack moving from room to room. It will be interesting to see the impact that this has on 4e modules. They may improve (from a Grognard's perspective).</p><p></p><p>The second is called "Points of Light" - it basically says that the implicit default world for 4e will be "points of light" in a world of wilderness -- i.e. you are safe within an hour of your village or a day of your city but beyond that, peasants should be scared. I scratched my head when I read this as wasn't this the same assumption for Karameikos (the default setting for Basic D&D)? For Greyhawk, you kind of have to read between the lines, but if you look at the population figures vs. the land area and compare those to medieval Europe where France alone had 10 or 15 million, and little England had up to 3 million at points in time vs. only 3-6 million for the Great Kingdom and Keoland, you can see that Greyhawk was a similar "Points of Light" implied setting. Does this mean that the sort of hyper-urban, magic shops on every corner implied by the magic item rules for 3.5e will be deemphasized? Will we see more outdoor encounters?</p><p></p><p>I'm sure that 4e <em>rules</em> will be a new system loosely based on 3.5e and thus will drift even further away from classic d&d rules but it is interesting to see that the default assumptions on how to run encounters and how the world is may be reverting back to the classic norms.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trollwad, post: 3739090, member: 19187"] There are two design essays on the Wizards website that show that the mentality if not the rules of 4e are a bit more old school than 3.5e. The first is called Dungeon Design in 4e. Many grognard types point out that the gigantic stat blocks and obsessive "CR matching" in 3.5E logically culminated in the Delve format and very set piece battles which reduced DM discretion and flexibility -- look at the 3.5e Ravenloft vs. its 1e predecessor. Many classic 1e modules such as the ship battle in Saltmarsh or the Forgotten Temple of Tharizdun have flowing multi-room, multi-stage battles. This essay implicitly criticizes 3.5e for its static nature and its inability to have flexible plans of attack moving from room to room. It will be interesting to see the impact that this has on 4e modules. They may improve (from a Grognard's perspective). The second is called "Points of Light" - it basically says that the implicit default world for 4e will be "points of light" in a world of wilderness -- i.e. you are safe within an hour of your village or a day of your city but beyond that, peasants should be scared. I scratched my head when I read this as wasn't this the same assumption for Karameikos (the default setting for Basic D&D)? For Greyhawk, you kind of have to read between the lines, but if you look at the population figures vs. the land area and compare those to medieval Europe where France alone had 10 or 15 million, and little England had up to 3 million at points in time vs. only 3-6 million for the Great Kingdom and Keoland, you can see that Greyhawk was a similar "Points of Light" implied setting. Does this mean that the sort of hyper-urban, magic shops on every corner implied by the magic item rules for 3.5e will be deemphasized? Will we see more outdoor encounters? I'm sure that 4e [I]rules[/I] will be a new system loosely based on 3.5e and thus will drift even further away from classic d&d rules but it is interesting to see that the default assumptions on how to run encounters and how the world is may be reverting back to the classic norms. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Quietly Back to the Past (in spirit)?
Top