Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Quintessential Fighter/Arms & Armor/Sword & Fist: What books are you using?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WizarDru" data-source="post: 85284" data-attributes="member: 151"><p>He was right here, along with the rest of us. Being released by WOTC gave S&F an edge, as did being the first classbook, it's true. But being the first FR product didn't save 'Into the Dragon's Lair' from tanking hideously, so the WOTC stamp isn't Carte Blanche.</p><p></p><p>More importantly, the major stink surrounding S&F was over a few specific items, moreso than majority of it's content. Mercurial was a bad idea then, it's a bad idea, now. Many folks also came down on S&F for being a classbook at all, and feared the return of 2e's massive splatbook campaign, with it's drastic succession of incompatible material. You'll note that every classbook since then has had less and less discussion about it, after it arrives.</p><p></p><p>This is a combination of better product, less ambitious goals, and the fact that fears have been allayed. In fact, if I had to choose, I'd rather have S&F's more ambitious approach and reel it back than have Song & Silence's dry material. Every class book has had broken material in it, bar none. Six pages of errata is not nearly so daunting if it contains detailed rules explanations and minor typo corrections. Look at that errata and see.</p><p></p><p>Do I actually use S&F in my game? Not very much, in truth...I see many of the classes useful only for NPCs, and much of the material is simply not applicable to my current game. But that's true of all the classbooks. I don't think it's the shining example of what classbooks should be...that's Tome & Blood's job, IMHO. But to claim that an overwhelming </p><p></p><p>And truthfully, when you label anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint as an apologist, and use a glittering generality like <em>'The book was badly done by nearly all accounts.'</em>, you're going to engender a negative reaction. Merely taking a quick trip to <a href="http://www.enworld.org/d20reviews.asp?sub=yes&where=currentprod&which=SnF" target="_blank">the d20 reviews page for Sword and Fist</a> shows quite a few people rated it with four stars (5) and three stars (6), and one person even rated it with five stars. Hardly a universal opinion, then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WizarDru, post: 85284, member: 151"] He was right here, along with the rest of us. Being released by WOTC gave S&F an edge, as did being the first classbook, it's true. But being the first FR product didn't save 'Into the Dragon's Lair' from tanking hideously, so the WOTC stamp isn't Carte Blanche. More importantly, the major stink surrounding S&F was over a few specific items, moreso than majority of it's content. Mercurial was a bad idea then, it's a bad idea, now. Many folks also came down on S&F for being a classbook at all, and feared the return of 2e's massive splatbook campaign, with it's drastic succession of incompatible material. You'll note that every classbook since then has had less and less discussion about it, after it arrives. This is a combination of better product, less ambitious goals, and the fact that fears have been allayed. In fact, if I had to choose, I'd rather have S&F's more ambitious approach and reel it back than have Song & Silence's dry material. Every class book has had broken material in it, bar none. Six pages of errata is not nearly so daunting if it contains detailed rules explanations and minor typo corrections. Look at that errata and see. Do I actually use S&F in my game? Not very much, in truth...I see many of the classes useful only for NPCs, and much of the material is simply not applicable to my current game. But that's true of all the classbooks. I don't think it's the shining example of what classbooks should be...that's Tome & Blood's job, IMHO. But to claim that an overwhelming And truthfully, when you label anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint as an apologist, and use a glittering generality like [i]'The book was badly done by nearly all accounts.'[/i], you're going to engender a negative reaction. Merely taking a quick trip to [URL=http://www.enworld.org/d20reviews.asp?sub=yes&where=currentprod&which=SnF]the d20 reviews page for Sword and Fist[/URL] shows quite a few people rated it with four stars (5) and three stars (6), and one person even rated it with five stars. Hardly a universal opinion, then. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Quintessential Fighter/Arms & Armor/Sword & Fist: What books are you using?
Top