Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Quintessential Rogue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 22062" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>Uh, No. I "slammed" you you for rating down an excellent product on the basis that it didn't fit <em>your</em> specific nonstandard cosmology, which should not be a basis for any recommendation to anyone else.</p><p></p><p>When I say "my rating is subjective", I was specifically refering to the numerical rating. I try to analyze various points of a book, but in the end, which points are important to you may not be the same ones that are important to others. When I assign a weight to the various factors to cobble it down to a number. But really, each person has their own weights and properly, what is a 4 to one person could be a 2 to another.</p><p></p><p>But you will never see me rate a product down simply because it didn't fit the specifics of my campaign. Case in point from your precious, Mongoose. Chaos Magic totally does not work for the magic assumptions in my game; I already have a very exacting idea of what "primal magical energy" is and how it works. But I gave the product a 4 because it was interesting and well considered.</p><p></p><p>I repeat: applicability to ones personal campaign should NEVER be a criteria for making review recomendations to anyone else. Ever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Psion, post: 22062, member: 172"] Uh, No. I "slammed" you you for rating down an excellent product on the basis that it didn't fit [i]your[/i] specific nonstandard cosmology, which should not be a basis for any recommendation to anyone else. When I say "my rating is subjective", I was specifically refering to the numerical rating. I try to analyze various points of a book, but in the end, which points are important to you may not be the same ones that are important to others. When I assign a weight to the various factors to cobble it down to a number. But really, each person has their own weights and properly, what is a 4 to one person could be a 2 to another. But you will never see me rate a product down simply because it didn't fit the specifics of my campaign. Case in point from your precious, Mongoose. Chaos Magic totally does not work for the magic assumptions in my game; I already have a very exacting idea of what "primal magical energy" is and how it works. But I gave the product a 4 because it was interesting and well considered. I repeat: applicability to ones personal campaign should NEVER be a criteria for making review recomendations to anyone else. Ever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Quintessential Rogue
Top