Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Quitting a group & starting anew..ground rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 2740671" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>You know what? If someone can fool me into believing they are a nice affable guy for a whole two year campaign, that's just fine. As long as the noises in their head don't bother me, no harm.</p><p></p><p>However, what really baffles me here is that you are proposing that a set of published rules saying "No serial killers" is more effective at screening out serial killers than a pre-game interview. Your job, in this thread, is not to illustrate that my strategy for screening out problem players is imperfect; your job, if you want to make your point, is to demonstrate that your method is more effective than mine is.I am arguing that my method is better at keeping nutcases away than yours, not that I have some form of easily-teachable telepathy.No. You garner more information about someone's social and psychological nature from an interpersonal interaction than you do by having them read a list of rules and then fill out a form.Ummmm... why is it bad to sound like you're talking directly to the person to whom you are talking directly?But only socially dysfunctional people would feel more secure about starting a long-term social relationship (which is what gaming is) based on a form and set of rules than starting one based on a productive and enjoyable meeting over a warm or cold beverage.But nobody is proposing to do that. Strawman alert. What I propose is having a nice free-flowing conversation comparing gaming tastes and social styles.There is nothing routine about filling out a form to participate in a social activity located in someone's home. Name another in-home social activity for which people are routinely asked to fill out forms.I have a bunch of journalist friends. They seem to have pretty mainstream ideas about social interaction. They also have a clear sense of people's on-record and off-record selves. The off-record self is a lot harder to conceal in a coffee date than on a form.But you have already credited that if someone asked the questions/stated the rules on the form, people would not be out of line in feeling offended. I don't understand what your position is here.I'm sorry but this is just nonsense. Have you ever penetrated an ungulate? You shouldn't be offended. After all, you have nothing to hide.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 2740671, member: 7240"] You know what? If someone can fool me into believing they are a nice affable guy for a whole two year campaign, that's just fine. As long as the noises in their head don't bother me, no harm. However, what really baffles me here is that you are proposing that a set of published rules saying "No serial killers" is more effective at screening out serial killers than a pre-game interview. Your job, in this thread, is not to illustrate that my strategy for screening out problem players is imperfect; your job, if you want to make your point, is to demonstrate that your method is more effective than mine is.I am arguing that my method is better at keeping nutcases away than yours, not that I have some form of easily-teachable telepathy.No. You garner more information about someone's social and psychological nature from an interpersonal interaction than you do by having them read a list of rules and then fill out a form.Ummmm... why is it bad to sound like you're talking directly to the person to whom you are talking directly?But only socially dysfunctional people would feel more secure about starting a long-term social relationship (which is what gaming is) based on a form and set of rules than starting one based on a productive and enjoyable meeting over a warm or cold beverage.But nobody is proposing to do that. Strawman alert. What I propose is having a nice free-flowing conversation comparing gaming tastes and social styles.There is nothing routine about filling out a form to participate in a social activity located in someone's home. Name another in-home social activity for which people are routinely asked to fill out forms.I have a bunch of journalist friends. They seem to have pretty mainstream ideas about social interaction. They also have a clear sense of people's on-record and off-record selves. The off-record self is a lot harder to conceal in a coffee date than on a form.But you have already credited that if someone asked the questions/stated the rules on the form, people would not be out of line in feeling offended. I don't understand what your position is here.I'm sorry but this is just nonsense. Have you ever penetrated an ungulate? You shouldn't be offended. After all, you have nothing to hide. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Quitting a group & starting anew..ground rules?
Top