Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Race Character Optimisation: Just Choose Dwarf
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tyrlaan" data-source="post: 5277849" data-attributes="member: 20998"><p>This conversation is like reading "tastes great! less filling!" commercial. </p><p></p><p>Here's the thing: </p><p>If you are a 100% pure bred optimizer, that extra +1 to hit makes the dwarf a no-brainer. Why? Because optimizing is about squeezing every drop of blood out of that stone. So yes, it's "just a +1", but hunting down these small bonuses and stacking them is what it's all about.</p><p></p><p>If you are not an optimizer (and personally I'd argue even if your just a 75% or less pure bred optimizer), this just doesn't matter. It never will and the difference will be as noticeable to you as I pointed out in my prior post in this thread.</p><p></p><p></p><p>These are two drastically different viewpoints that clearly are not seeing eye to eye. And at the end of the day (at the risk of repeating sentiments in my previous post), who cares? I'm not a 100% pure bred optimizer and I really don't care what an optimizer does in a game that doesn't include me. If said optimizer feels that they must play a dwarf warden to be optimized, why should it matter to me? On the flip side, if I were a 100% pure bred optimizer, I really wouldn't care what a non-optimizer did in a game that didn't include me. </p><p></p><p>I will concede that I don't see the fun in optimizing. The game certainly doesn't call for it (in my opinion, on many levels - its not a competition, it's collaborative; playing against type can be fun; the game is about role playing not roll playing; more options feels a lot cooler than limiting options). BUT, if that's what floats your boat - float away. It's not my place to tell you or anyone what is or isn't fun. But then that's kind of the point of fun - it's a personal thing.</p><p></p><p>In the meantime, it would be pretty awesome if folks would just say <strong>"yes a dwarf is a solid optimized choice but if you want to play something else you're not exactly gimping yourself"</strong>?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tyrlaan, post: 5277849, member: 20998"] This conversation is like reading "tastes great! less filling!" commercial. Here's the thing: If you are a 100% pure bred optimizer, that extra +1 to hit makes the dwarf a no-brainer. Why? Because optimizing is about squeezing every drop of blood out of that stone. So yes, it's "just a +1", but hunting down these small bonuses and stacking them is what it's all about. If you are not an optimizer (and personally I'd argue even if your just a 75% or less pure bred optimizer), this just doesn't matter. It never will and the difference will be as noticeable to you as I pointed out in my prior post in this thread. These are two drastically different viewpoints that clearly are not seeing eye to eye. And at the end of the day (at the risk of repeating sentiments in my previous post), who cares? I'm not a 100% pure bred optimizer and I really don't care what an optimizer does in a game that doesn't include me. If said optimizer feels that they must play a dwarf warden to be optimized, why should it matter to me? On the flip side, if I were a 100% pure bred optimizer, I really wouldn't care what a non-optimizer did in a game that didn't include me. I will concede that I don't see the fun in optimizing. The game certainly doesn't call for it (in my opinion, on many levels - its not a competition, it's collaborative; playing against type can be fun; the game is about role playing not roll playing; more options feels a lot cooler than limiting options). BUT, if that's what floats your boat - float away. It's not my place to tell you or anyone what is or isn't fun. But then that's kind of the point of fun - it's a personal thing. In the meantime, it would be pretty awesome if folks would just say [B]"yes a dwarf is a solid optimized choice but if you want to play something else you're not exactly gimping yourself"[/B]? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Race Character Optimisation: Just Choose Dwarf
Top