Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Race Class combo, together, defines a character ‘type’
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 7249994" data-attributes="member: 58172"><p><strong>Race Class combo, together, defines a character ‘type’</strong></p><p></p><p>The race-class combo, together, is what defines a character ‘type’.</p><p></p><p>The raw data from Dungeons and Dragons Beyond demonstrates that when players create a character that they want to play, they are selecting a flavorful specific race-class combo, rather than just a class alone or just a race alone.</p><p></p><p>A *character* is a specific character concept that blends together both its race flavor and its class flavor. This concept is what makes a playable ‘type’. Players seem to strongly want overall character concepts that combine a specific race and specific class together into a single comprehensive flavorful idea. </p><p></p><p>It is vital that D&D makes sure that each specific race-class combo can synergize mechanically optimally.</p><p></p><p>If a race-class combo is popular, how much more important it is to get its mechanics right.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The most popular classes and the most popular races are an abstraction when considered in isolation from each other. In reality, it is the specific race-class that players care about.</p><p></p><p>In abstraction, on average, the most popular classes are Fighter, Rogue, Wizard, and Barbarian. And the most popular races are Human, Elf, Half-Elf, and Dwarf. But the raw data displays the specific incidences. So the most popular *characters* are as follows.</p><p></p><p>(Technical note. Here the top-20 characters cluster together according to their decimal magnitudes, approximating the proportions of the inverse Golden Ratio.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Top 20 Character ‘Types’</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>Human Fighter</p><p></p><p>Elf Ranger</p><p>Elf Wizard</p><p>Human Wizard</p><p>Human Rogue</p><p></p><p>Human Cleric</p><p>Human Paladin</p><p>Elf Rogue</p><p>Dwarf Cleric</p><p>Tiefling Warlock</p><p>Dwarf Fighter</p><p></p><p>Human Monk</p><p>Half-Elf Bard</p><p>Halfling Rogue</p><p>Elf Druid</p><p>Goliath Barbarian</p><p>Human Ranger</p><p>Human Warlock</p><p>Half-Orc Barbarian</p><p>Dragonborn Paladin</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Comments</strong></p><p></p><p>So, the <strong>Human Fighter</strong> is the most popular character type that players want to play. It is in a magnitude all its own. (Would love to know about stats for Variant Human and Battle Master Fighter.) This is the Bronze Age warrior king archetype, incarnates as King David of the Iron Age, as Alexander the Great in the Classic Age, as King Arthur in the Medieval Age, and still a favorite today as the Jock. Occasionally in both ancient and modern times, a woman hero shows up to incarnate this Warrior King archetype. A Human Fighter, who proves competence in battle and is able to save the population from various threats.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then comes the <strong>Elf Ranger</strong> and <strong>Elf Wizard</strong>. Presumably, these two types are Wood Elf Ranger and High Elf Wizard. These two combo types are top priority. For both, it is extremely important to make sure that the mechanics for the Ranger and Wizard classes and their respective Elf cultures, Wood and High, all have extremely good mechanics to synergize excellently with their counterparts.</p><p></p><p>It is important to improve the mechanics for the Ranger. The Ranger class (or several spin-off classes from it) must make players happy − especially Wood Elf players that are most prominent. Already, the Wood Elf culture synergizes with the current Ranger. It is the class that needs to be better. Conversely, the Wizard class is decent, it is the High Elf culture mechanics that need to synergize with the Wizard.</p><p></p><p>The fact the Elf Ranger is so popular, while the Human Ranger is significantly less popular, is one of the indications that players are choosing for the sake of overall character concept and flavor. Not class in isolation. (Even with regard to the Human Ranger, it is likely a specific combo type that players are trying to play. Namely, Aragorn from Tolkien.)</p><p></p><p>The Wood-Elf-Ranger type seems to have inherited all of the traditions from the early D&D High Elf being a gishy ‘Fighter/Magic-User’. The Eldrich Knight Fighter seems unable to serve in this capacity.</p><p></p><p> Thus, in the attempts to improve the Ranger class, one of its options must have the Wood Elf in mind to synergize optimally with it. This kind of Ranger must be a magical warrior, with strong gishy, overtly magical offense spells, as well as woodsy wilderness flavor. At the same time, this kind of Elven Ranger is light armored, dex-fighting, and skilled at archery, as well as stealthy. In other words, this is more a magical version of ‘special ops’, rather than a skirmishing ‘light infantry’. But for the Wood Elf, magical warcraft is central to the concept.</p><p></p><p>The Wood-Elf-Ranger type is a stealthy magical warrior. In the top 20 list, the Rogue shows up to emphasize the stealthy warrior aspects of the Ranger and the Druid shows up to emphasize the magic aspects of the Ranger. Yet the prevailing concept of the Wood Elf is both magic and a special ops warrior.</p><p></p><p>The only time the Druid class makes an appearance is because it happens to be part of the comprehensive Elf Druid combo ‘type’, a woodsy full caster, tapping into the aspects of the Ranger gish. Nevertheless, Wood Elf flavor is mostly a gish combining fighting with magic in the form or a Ranger, despite mundane Rogue and full caster Druid making an appearance. </p><p></p><p>By contrast, the High Elf flavor is almost entirely a full caster, a Wizard.</p><p></p><p>These two types that prevail for the Elf are the Wood Elf Ranger and the High Elf Wizard. The game works better when both of these concepts are mechanically optimal.</p><p></p><p>The most wanted Elf flavor is innately magical, and is either a Ranger gish or a Wizard full caster. These are the vibrant archetypes for the Elf cultures. They are the two ‘types’ that players most want to play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Human Fighter, <strong>Human Wizard</strong>, and <strong>Human Rogue</strong> seem good indications for popular classes, but moreso typify the flavor of Human culture itself. Warrior, technologist, badass.</p><p></p><p>In a third magnitude cluster, come the <strong>Human Cleric</strong> − presumably because of the perceived need for a dedicated healer − and the <strong>Human Paladin</strong> holy warrior. Both express a sacred mystical dimension to the Human race. The Human as a mysterious ‘soul’.</p><p></p><p>Altho Cleric and Paladin do slightly less well on average when abstracting the most popular classes, they make a good showing here as part of overall Human character concepts. Especially what ‘types’ constitute the Human race.</p><p></p><p>Later in a fourth magnitude cluster, the <strong>Human Monk</strong> makes an appearance, perhaps blending all of these Human qualities − warrior, ki-wielding technologist, badass, and mysterious mystical soul.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Dwarf Cleric</strong> and <strong>Dwarf Fighter</strong>. In that order. These are virtually the only concepts that typify the D&D Dwarf cultures. Probably each should dominate one Dwarf culture. Wisdom Cleric prevailing among the Hill Dwarf, and Strength Fighter prevailing among the Mountain Dwarf. Make sure each class-culture combo synergizes mechanically.</p><p></p><p>The fact <strong>Tiefling Warlock</strong> enjoys significantly more popularity than Human Warlock, suggests most players want the overall character concept that combos both the race and the class together as a single comprehensive concept.</p><p></p><p><strong> Half-Elf Bard</strong>. Half-Elf only appears in the top 20 characters as a Bard. This is currently the only place where the Fey flavor can happen for the Charisma as charm, magic, beauty, art, and playing with minds. Similarly, the Elf that is indigenous to the Feywild, the Eladrin, is primarily a Charismatic Bard culture. It is all about magic, beauty, and playing with minds.</p><p></p><p>The only time Halfling makes an appearance is as the childlike <strong>Halfling Rogue</strong> combo.</p><p></p><p>The only time a Goliath makes an appearance is as the rugged <strong>Goliath Barbarian</strong>. A surprisingly strong showing for an otherwise less popular race. It is the combo that matters.</p><p></p><p>The only time a Half-Orc makes an appearance is as the savage <strong>Half-Orc-Barbarian</strong>.</p><p></p><p>The only time a Dragonborn makes an appearance in the top 20 is as an ironically noble <strong>Dragonborn-Paladin</strong> character type. The flavor of the Paladin is decisively Human. Yet the remix fusion of the medieval Knight-versus-Dragon archetype, seems to find traction in the form of an ironically noble Dragonborn Paladin.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In sum, the evidence demonstrates how players are choosing specific race-class combos, rather than races alone or classes alone. Together these comprehensive combos are what define a ‘type’, the specific archetype that players want to play. Players choose this because the specific combo is what creates the desirable flavor.</p><p></p><p>Advanced players will occasionally want to play ‘against type’. But each type itself, in the first place, must work well as an optimal synergistic combo.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>In Sum</strong></p><p></p><p>The character ‘types’ that players most want to play are:</p><p></p><p>Human Fighter, Human Wizard, Human Rogue, Human Cleric, Human Paladin, Human Monk.</p><p>= warrior, technologist, badass, mystical soul</p><p></p><p>High Elf Wizard</p><p>= only full caster, Harry Potter School for Wizards</p><p></p><p>Wood Elf Ranger, Wood Elf Rogue, Wood Elf Druid</p><p>= stealthy gish</p><p></p><p>Dwarf Cleric, Dwarf Fighter</p><p>= devoted, idealistic, intrepid</p><p></p><p>Half-Elf Bard</p><p>= Fey Charisma, charm, magic, beauty, and playing with minds</p><p></p><p>Halfling Rogue</p><p>= only</p><p></p><p>Goliath Barbarian</p><p>= only</p><p></p><p>Half-Orc Barbarian</p><p>= only</p><p></p><p>Dragonborn Paladin</p><p>= only</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 7249994, member: 58172"] [b]Race Class combo, together, defines a character ‘type’[/b] The race-class combo, together, is what defines a character ‘type’. The raw data from Dungeons and Dragons Beyond demonstrates that when players create a character that they want to play, they are selecting a flavorful specific race-class combo, rather than just a class alone or just a race alone. A *character* is a specific character concept that blends together both its race flavor and its class flavor. This concept is what makes a playable ‘type’. Players seem to strongly want overall character concepts that combine a specific race and specific class together into a single comprehensive flavorful idea. It is vital that D&D makes sure that each specific race-class combo can synergize mechanically optimally. If a race-class combo is popular, how much more important it is to get its mechanics right. The most popular classes and the most popular races are an abstraction when considered in isolation from each other. In reality, it is the specific race-class that players care about. In abstraction, on average, the most popular classes are Fighter, Rogue, Wizard, and Barbarian. And the most popular races are Human, Elf, Half-Elf, and Dwarf. But the raw data displays the specific incidences. So the most popular *characters* are as follows. (Technical note. Here the top-20 characters cluster together according to their decimal magnitudes, approximating the proportions of the inverse Golden Ratio.) [B]Top 20 Character ‘Types’ [/B] Human Fighter Elf Ranger Elf Wizard Human Wizard Human Rogue Human Cleric Human Paladin Elf Rogue Dwarf Cleric Tiefling Warlock Dwarf Fighter Human Monk Half-Elf Bard Halfling Rogue Elf Druid Goliath Barbarian Human Ranger Human Warlock Half-Orc Barbarian Dragonborn Paladin [B] Comments[/B] So, the [B]Human Fighter[/B] is the most popular character type that players want to play. It is in a magnitude all its own. (Would love to know about stats for Variant Human and Battle Master Fighter.) This is the Bronze Age warrior king archetype, incarnates as King David of the Iron Age, as Alexander the Great in the Classic Age, as King Arthur in the Medieval Age, and still a favorite today as the Jock. Occasionally in both ancient and modern times, a woman hero shows up to incarnate this Warrior King archetype. A Human Fighter, who proves competence in battle and is able to save the population from various threats. Then comes the [B]Elf Ranger[/B] and [B]Elf Wizard[/B]. Presumably, these two types are Wood Elf Ranger and High Elf Wizard. These two combo types are top priority. For both, it is extremely important to make sure that the mechanics for the Ranger and Wizard classes and their respective Elf cultures, Wood and High, all have extremely good mechanics to synergize excellently with their counterparts. It is important to improve the mechanics for the Ranger. The Ranger class (or several spin-off classes from it) must make players happy − especially Wood Elf players that are most prominent. Already, the Wood Elf culture synergizes with the current Ranger. It is the class that needs to be better. Conversely, the Wizard class is decent, it is the High Elf culture mechanics that need to synergize with the Wizard. The fact the Elf Ranger is so popular, while the Human Ranger is significantly less popular, is one of the indications that players are choosing for the sake of overall character concept and flavor. Not class in isolation. (Even with regard to the Human Ranger, it is likely a specific combo type that players are trying to play. Namely, Aragorn from Tolkien.) The Wood-Elf-Ranger type seems to have inherited all of the traditions from the early D&D High Elf being a gishy ‘Fighter/Magic-User’. The Eldrich Knight Fighter seems unable to serve in this capacity. Thus, in the attempts to improve the Ranger class, one of its options must have the Wood Elf in mind to synergize optimally with it. This kind of Ranger must be a magical warrior, with strong gishy, overtly magical offense spells, as well as woodsy wilderness flavor. At the same time, this kind of Elven Ranger is light armored, dex-fighting, and skilled at archery, as well as stealthy. In other words, this is more a magical version of ‘special ops’, rather than a skirmishing ‘light infantry’. But for the Wood Elf, magical warcraft is central to the concept. The Wood-Elf-Ranger type is a stealthy magical warrior. In the top 20 list, the Rogue shows up to emphasize the stealthy warrior aspects of the Ranger and the Druid shows up to emphasize the magic aspects of the Ranger. Yet the prevailing concept of the Wood Elf is both magic and a special ops warrior. The only time the Druid class makes an appearance is because it happens to be part of the comprehensive Elf Druid combo ‘type’, a woodsy full caster, tapping into the aspects of the Ranger gish. Nevertheless, Wood Elf flavor is mostly a gish combining fighting with magic in the form or a Ranger, despite mundane Rogue and full caster Druid making an appearance. By contrast, the High Elf flavor is almost entirely a full caster, a Wizard. These two types that prevail for the Elf are the Wood Elf Ranger and the High Elf Wizard. The game works better when both of these concepts are mechanically optimal. The most wanted Elf flavor is innately magical, and is either a Ranger gish or a Wizard full caster. These are the vibrant archetypes for the Elf cultures. They are the two ‘types’ that players most want to play. Human Fighter, [B]Human Wizard[/B], and [B]Human Rogue[/B] seem good indications for popular classes, but moreso typify the flavor of Human culture itself. Warrior, technologist, badass. In a third magnitude cluster, come the [B]Human Cleric[/B] − presumably because of the perceived need for a dedicated healer − and the [B]Human Paladin[/B] holy warrior. Both express a sacred mystical dimension to the Human race. The Human as a mysterious ‘soul’. Altho Cleric and Paladin do slightly less well on average when abstracting the most popular classes, they make a good showing here as part of overall Human character concepts. Especially what ‘types’ constitute the Human race. Later in a fourth magnitude cluster, the [B]Human Monk[/B] makes an appearance, perhaps blending all of these Human qualities − warrior, ki-wielding technologist, badass, and mysterious mystical soul. [B]Dwarf Cleric[/B] and [B]Dwarf Fighter[/B]. In that order. These are virtually the only concepts that typify the D&D Dwarf cultures. Probably each should dominate one Dwarf culture. Wisdom Cleric prevailing among the Hill Dwarf, and Strength Fighter prevailing among the Mountain Dwarf. Make sure each class-culture combo synergizes mechanically. The fact [B]Tiefling Warlock[/B] enjoys significantly more popularity than Human Warlock, suggests most players want the overall character concept that combos both the race and the class together as a single comprehensive concept. [B] Half-Elf Bard[/B]. Half-Elf only appears in the top 20 characters as a Bard. This is currently the only place where the Fey flavor can happen for the Charisma as charm, magic, beauty, art, and playing with minds. Similarly, the Elf that is indigenous to the Feywild, the Eladrin, is primarily a Charismatic Bard culture. It is all about magic, beauty, and playing with minds. The only time Halfling makes an appearance is as the childlike [B]Halfling Rogue[/B] combo. The only time a Goliath makes an appearance is as the rugged [B]Goliath Barbarian[/B]. A surprisingly strong showing for an otherwise less popular race. It is the combo that matters. The only time a Half-Orc makes an appearance is as the savage [B]Half-Orc-Barbarian[/B]. The only time a Dragonborn makes an appearance in the top 20 is as an ironically noble [B]Dragonborn-Paladin[/B] character type. The flavor of the Paladin is decisively Human. Yet the remix fusion of the medieval Knight-versus-Dragon archetype, seems to find traction in the form of an ironically noble Dragonborn Paladin. In sum, the evidence demonstrates how players are choosing specific race-class combos, rather than races alone or classes alone. Together these comprehensive combos are what define a ‘type’, the specific archetype that players want to play. Players choose this because the specific combo is what creates the desirable flavor. Advanced players will occasionally want to play ‘against type’. But each type itself, in the first place, must work well as an optimal synergistic combo. [B] In Sum[/B] The character ‘types’ that players most want to play are: Human Fighter, Human Wizard, Human Rogue, Human Cleric, Human Paladin, Human Monk. = warrior, technologist, badass, mystical soul High Elf Wizard = only full caster, Harry Potter School for Wizards Wood Elf Ranger, Wood Elf Rogue, Wood Elf Druid = stealthy gish Dwarf Cleric, Dwarf Fighter = devoted, idealistic, intrepid Half-Elf Bard = Fey Charisma, charm, magic, beauty, and playing with minds Halfling Rogue = only Goliath Barbarian = only Half-Orc Barbarian = only Dragonborn Paladin = only [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Race Class combo, together, defines a character ‘type’
Top