Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rowport" data-source="post: 2048335" data-attributes="member: 9729">The biggest problem with all three of the "Race" books is the inclusion of the new core race in each.  Since nearly a third of the entire book is dedicated to those new races, if you do not like them, you will have a hard time liking the book as a whole.  I really enjoyed Races of Stone, because I liked the Goliath race and thought it well-executed.  I think there is quite a bit of other good material, especially dwarven feats and equipment.  I feel similarly about Races of the Wild, because the added background, campaign, and encounter material for the PrCs really adds a lot, and I like both elves and halflings (I hate the raptorians, but can overlook it since the rest of the book is excellent).  Races of Destiny sucked on all levels, unfortunately- the illumians are terrible in concept and execution, and the 'half-races' are really quite dull on their own merits.If Races of Eberron follows the format of Races of the Wild I think it will be worthwhile.  If you play or plan to play one of the specific races in any of the books they are likely worthwhile for you, even if not for the general audience.</blockquote>