Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Races of Faerun +level inconsistencies and potential errata?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Technik4" data-source="post: 853349" data-attributes="member: 7211"><p>Still on topic:</p><p></p><p>Its pretty much a fact that aasimar and tiefling are on the strong side of ECL +1. Genasi, Aquatic Elves, and Forest Gnomes (from RoF) are on the weaker side. Gray Orc is somewhere inbetween.</p><p></p><p>ECL +2 gets you Arctic Dwarf, Drow, Fey'ri, Gray Dwarf, Orog, or Arocokra.</p><p></p><p>ECL +3 gets you a strong Fey'ri, Avariel, or Deep Gnome</p><p></p><p>ECL +4 is Urdunnir Dwarf, Shade, Half-Celestial, Half-Fiend, and Half-Dragon (erratad versions of the Half-templates).</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now, where do you place the ECL +2/3/4s? Personally I'd take an Avariel over a strong Fey'ri or a Deep Gnome. Avariel have the best stat bonuses, and by far the best mobility. Fey'ri get a cool trick for taking an extra ECL, but they suffer the same Con negatives as Avariel. Maybe this is just my personal tilt, I'd rather have flight all day and all night than some neat tricks up my sleeve. If you factor in roleplaying opportunities/restrictions, I can't see a reason to play a Fey'ri. Deep gnome is somewhere in the middle, that +4 dodge vs EVERYTHING is nice.</p><p></p><p>As for the +4s, I think the Half-Templates are still some of the best choices, but its very difficult to choke down a +4 ECL with no racial hit die. Avariel are clearly weaker than any of these races. Avariel are also clearly more powerful than any of the +2 races. Hence, +3, and IMO, on the stronger side of +3.</p><p></p><p>Technik</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Technik4, post: 853349, member: 7211"] Still on topic: Its pretty much a fact that aasimar and tiefling are on the strong side of ECL +1. Genasi, Aquatic Elves, and Forest Gnomes (from RoF) are on the weaker side. Gray Orc is somewhere inbetween. ECL +2 gets you Arctic Dwarf, Drow, Fey'ri, Gray Dwarf, Orog, or Arocokra. ECL +3 gets you a strong Fey'ri, Avariel, or Deep Gnome ECL +4 is Urdunnir Dwarf, Shade, Half-Celestial, Half-Fiend, and Half-Dragon (erratad versions of the Half-templates). Now, where do you place the ECL +2/3/4s? Personally I'd take an Avariel over a strong Fey'ri or a Deep Gnome. Avariel have the best stat bonuses, and by far the best mobility. Fey'ri get a cool trick for taking an extra ECL, but they suffer the same Con negatives as Avariel. Maybe this is just my personal tilt, I'd rather have flight all day and all night than some neat tricks up my sleeve. If you factor in roleplaying opportunities/restrictions, I can't see a reason to play a Fey'ri. Deep gnome is somewhere in the middle, that +4 dodge vs EVERYTHING is nice. As for the +4s, I think the Half-Templates are still some of the best choices, but its very difficult to choke down a +4 ECL with no racial hit die. Avariel are clearly weaker than any of these races. Avariel are also clearly more powerful than any of the +2 races. Hence, +3, and IMO, on the stronger side of +3. Technik [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Races of Faerun +level inconsistencies and potential errata?!
Top