Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Richard Baker" data-source="post: 388669" data-attributes="member: 7439">Re: HEY RICH BAKER!Why didn't we do the saurials? Well, there are a couple of reasons.First, the book was short on space. No lie. I had to cut about 30,000 words from Eric Boyd's turnover alone.Second, the saurials are isolated in one particular spot of the Realms, and don't seem to get out much.Third, the saurials have a number of strange abilities that don't convert to 3-E very nicely, like the whole &quot;we speak at a frequency you can't hear&quot; thing.Finally, and I hate to say this, saurials just fall a little too far on the wrong side of my personal wacky-meter. Everybody's got their own opinions, and I won't represent mine as any better than anyone else's about this sort of thing, but I'm just not in a hurry to get the saurials into 3E game product. I know a number of people will feel differently, but hey, there it is.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Richard Baker, post: 388669, member: 7439"] [b]Re: HEY RICH BAKER![/b] Why didn't we do the saurials? Well, there are a couple of reasons. First, the book was short on space. No lie. I had to cut about 30,000 words from Eric Boyd's turnover alone. Second, the saurials are isolated in one particular spot of the Realms, and don't seem to get out much. Third, the saurials have a number of strange abilities that don't convert to 3-E very nicely, like the whole "we speak at a frequency you can't hear" thing. Finally, and I hate to say this, saurials just fall a little too far on the wrong side of my personal wacky-meter. Everybody's got their own opinions, and I won't represent mine as any better than anyone else's about this sort of thing, but I'm just not in a hurry to get the saurials into 3E game product. I know a number of people will feel differently, but hey, there it is. [/QUOTE]

Verification