Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Racial restrictions on Dragonmarks in 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 5919205" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I'm fine with either version.</p><p></p><p>The 4E version basically stated that anyone who had a dragonmark who was not a part of the race that normally had it, was a never-before-probably-never-again occurance that should be a major, major plot point of the entire campaign. The mark would be equivelant to a aberrant mark since it appeared on the wrong race, the house that controlled the mark would hunt down the PC so they could try and figure out how this happened, the Chamber would be interested in this random occurance and whether or not that had some impact on the prophecy, so on and so forth. While you could do it and allow it, it was not something to just do lightly.</p><p></p><p>The whole point of Eberron was a campaign world full of mysteries and exploration. And the dragonmarks were one mystery that was fully expected DMs would run wild with... whether it was the disappeared thirteenth Mark of Death, the differences between the Eberron, Siberys, and Khyber marks... and random marks appearing on random people (the module Eyes of the Lich Queen has an entire plotline of this happening.) So 4E telling folks that they can do it if they really wanted to was just make expressed the purpose that they were really there for... really cool and interesting McGuffins for the campaign.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 5919205, member: 7006"] I'm fine with either version. The 4E version basically stated that anyone who had a dragonmark who was not a part of the race that normally had it, was a never-before-probably-never-again occurance that should be a major, major plot point of the entire campaign. The mark would be equivelant to a aberrant mark since it appeared on the wrong race, the house that controlled the mark would hunt down the PC so they could try and figure out how this happened, the Chamber would be interested in this random occurance and whether or not that had some impact on the prophecy, so on and so forth. While you could do it and allow it, it was not something to just do lightly. The whole point of Eberron was a campaign world full of mysteries and exploration. And the dragonmarks were one mystery that was fully expected DMs would run wild with... whether it was the disappeared thirteenth Mark of Death, the differences between the Eberron, Siberys, and Khyber marks... and random marks appearing on random people (the module Eyes of the Lich Queen has an entire plotline of this happening.) So 4E telling folks that they can do it if they really wanted to was just make expressed the purpose that they were really there for... really cool and interesting McGuffins for the campaign. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Racial restrictions on Dragonmarks in 5E?
Top