Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Racial Scores bonuses.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cjosephs1s" data-source="post: 5730838" data-attributes="member: 6683450"><p>Maybe this will shed some light on the subject. I'm not saying this is what the author intended its just my opinion on why this system works and is "balanced" in the DMG. </p><p> </p><p>Ok first off throw out this idea that one class is better than another (i hate this idea to the core). In WotC world all classes start off balanced. Yes we all know a wizard will kill a warrior at 20th level but I think we all would agree that most DMs goal is not to just flat out kill the party or have constant PVP contests. So the base assumption is all classes are equally useful in a campaign and you want to have a somewhat balanced party. No melee means your casters are getting the crap beaten out of them. No casters means less damage and utility. No healers means your melee may die and will much more cautios before charging that dragon. No utility means traps, locks, and other fun things can easily halt your dungeon crawl or kill a party member. It doesn't matter how you get the 4 but you want one of each or more than one of each.</p><p> </p><p>Ok now why are physical stats "more expensive" than mental stats? Its about utility of the stat. Add STR to any toon and they get a benefit. They can carry more, they have a better chance to hit, they do more physical damage. Every toon benefits from this. Add Con to any toon and they get more HP, their Fort save goes up. Add Dex to any toon and their Initiative goes up, their ranged attack goes up, their reflex save goes up. These three stats are all very useful to every class in the game even casters (yes at low levels casters run out of spells and need to attack or make touch attacks so STR is still important and decreases over time but you get the bonus in the beginning when its most useful). </p><p> </p><p>Your mental stats: Wisdom adds to your will save for everyone. That's it. and for casters it adds bonus spells and increases save DC but not damage, duration, or anything else to do with the spell. Int only adds skill points to all characters. Some toons don't get crap for skills anyway and don't care while others get enough skill points to make up for it so the small bonus isn't something they are worried about compared to their main stat. Only INt based casters gain a benefit from it and the same as Wis..bonus spells and higher DC. Cha only effects CHA based casters and is effectively the "dump stat" for everyone else. </p><p> </p><p>Then there is opportunity cost associated with these. For a warrior he really doesn't care if he takes a -2 to INT and Cha if he gets a +2 to STR. So what if hes a little dumber has 1 less skill point and has a huge scar on his face...thats just cool for us. Just like the Wizard wants that bonus to INT and Cha and more than likely will give up the +2 STR, extra weight, and the chance to hit to increase his spell slots, DCs, skill points and make him a tad more charming when trying to negotiate that deal with the other wizard for their latest mission. </p><p> </p><p>Now not all stat combinations are equally inviting as these to all classes. That's why you don't see many dwarven sorcerers or half orc wizards, but nothing is stopping a PC from doing it. Maybe they want their caster to be touch based and need the extra STR and don't want to waste one of their very precious feats on weapon finesse? </p><p> </p><p>So is the system balance? Well its been working for how many DECADES??? Is this tier system correct? probably but its based on certain assumptions that don't correlate well with WotC assumptions and since its based on different rules doesn't agree with gameplay mechanics (think of trying to incorporate a d10 system like Mage and playing by DnD rules..its just won't work well). </p><p> </p><p>Maybe my perspective on how its supposed to work will shed some light on why its set up the way it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cjosephs1s, post: 5730838, member: 6683450"] Maybe this will shed some light on the subject. I'm not saying this is what the author intended its just my opinion on why this system works and is "balanced" in the DMG. Ok first off throw out this idea that one class is better than another (i hate this idea to the core). In WotC world all classes start off balanced. Yes we all know a wizard will kill a warrior at 20th level but I think we all would agree that most DMs goal is not to just flat out kill the party or have constant PVP contests. So the base assumption is all classes are equally useful in a campaign and you want to have a somewhat balanced party. No melee means your casters are getting the crap beaten out of them. No casters means less damage and utility. No healers means your melee may die and will much more cautios before charging that dragon. No utility means traps, locks, and other fun things can easily halt your dungeon crawl or kill a party member. It doesn't matter how you get the 4 but you want one of each or more than one of each. Ok now why are physical stats "more expensive" than mental stats? Its about utility of the stat. Add STR to any toon and they get a benefit. They can carry more, they have a better chance to hit, they do more physical damage. Every toon benefits from this. Add Con to any toon and they get more HP, their Fort save goes up. Add Dex to any toon and their Initiative goes up, their ranged attack goes up, their reflex save goes up. These three stats are all very useful to every class in the game even casters (yes at low levels casters run out of spells and need to attack or make touch attacks so STR is still important and decreases over time but you get the bonus in the beginning when its most useful). Your mental stats: Wisdom adds to your will save for everyone. That's it. and for casters it adds bonus spells and increases save DC but not damage, duration, or anything else to do with the spell. Int only adds skill points to all characters. Some toons don't get crap for skills anyway and don't care while others get enough skill points to make up for it so the small bonus isn't something they are worried about compared to their main stat. Only INt based casters gain a benefit from it and the same as Wis..bonus spells and higher DC. Cha only effects CHA based casters and is effectively the "dump stat" for everyone else. Then there is opportunity cost associated with these. For a warrior he really doesn't care if he takes a -2 to INT and Cha if he gets a +2 to STR. So what if hes a little dumber has 1 less skill point and has a huge scar on his face...thats just cool for us. Just like the Wizard wants that bonus to INT and Cha and more than likely will give up the +2 STR, extra weight, and the chance to hit to increase his spell slots, DCs, skill points and make him a tad more charming when trying to negotiate that deal with the other wizard for their latest mission. Now not all stat combinations are equally inviting as these to all classes. That's why you don't see many dwarven sorcerers or half orc wizards, but nothing is stopping a PC from doing it. Maybe they want their caster to be touch based and need the extra STR and don't want to waste one of their very precious feats on weapon finesse? So is the system balance? Well its been working for how many DECADES??? Is this tier system correct? probably but its based on certain assumptions that don't correlate well with WotC assumptions and since its based on different rules doesn't agree with gameplay mechanics (think of trying to incorporate a d10 system like Mage and playing by DnD rules..its just won't work well). Maybe my perspective on how its supposed to work will shed some light on why its set up the way it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Racial Scores bonuses.
Top