Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Railroading" is just a pejorative term for...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5405186" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Without knowing more about how you play and prep, I can't really say whether you are on an adventure path or in a sandbox. But the important point that has to be made is that I can't know which of the two you are doing because what you have described is (IMO) simply 'good DMing' and is a feature of either good linear or good sandbox play. Whether you are doing a sandbox, or whether you are constructing an adventure path from week to week, presumably the good DM is feeding the players situations that engauge their known concerns signalled via PC backstories plus choices made in previous episodes of play. I'd be doing that even if I was running the Dragon Lance moduels (as written, a very railroady adventure path) or if I was running an open ended 'pirate campaign' where the PC's sailed around in a boat exploring a world I had detailed.</p><p></p><p>There is of course more than one axis by which game structures can be plotted and described. Linear vs. non-linear is not the only feature of games, adventures, and campaigns. Just because you can pick out a salient feature of your game that doesn't lie on the llinear vs. non-linear axis doesn't mean that the distinction between an adventure path and a sandbox isn't real. It could be that you are playing in a fuzzy grey area in the middle where you switch back and forth between linear preperation for the session (tonight A will happen, then B will happen, then C will happen) and sandbox preperation (typically a map, location details, random encounter tables of various sorts whether events, monsters, or weather, large lists of wandering NPC's, etc.), and so the most salient feature of your prep is the tailoring you do to the dramatic conflict and themes proposed by the players. </p><p></p><p>The axis you are talking about, who controls the dramatic theme of play, is an interesting one - one that gets alot of discussion at Forge - but it doesn't mean that play isn't linear vs. non-linear. One additional way to describe a Railroad (the game type, as opposed to the act of railroading) is that it is not only linear, but the players have no ability through play to control or choose the dramatic conflict or the themes of the story. It is usually a feature of sandboxing that the players have greater control over the theme than in linear play, but its quite easy to imagine a Rowboat world where the players don't control the theme because there is no theme and they lack the ability to create meaningful dramatic conflict because the GM simply isn't putting enough effort into the story. Similarly, we could imagine a DM running the Dragon Lance modules with player created characters rather than pre-generated ones, and the DM tailoring the game to the conflicts generated by those party and intraparty conflicts rather than the stock ones presented by the modules and official story. The story is still on the whole linear with familiar places and events, if slightly different from the linear one presented in the modules, but the small events of the story revolve around different tensions and the PC's may have different presumed relationships with various NPC's. One of the original PC's might for example turn out to have been a dragon all along. Another might end up being a dragon Highlord's son, etc.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, I don't want to give the impression that I think good GMing means that the players are solely in control of the stories dramatic themes. The GM is a player too, and as the player most invested in the game (in terms of time and effort put into it, for example) the GM has a the reasonable expectation of having very large say what the story is about. Most players expect and have a reasonable expectation that the GM has a very interesting, exciting, twist filled, and thought provoking story in mind. Very little to me says poor DMing like a DM that doesn't have a story in mind and expects the players to effectively do all the work of world and story creation. I'm just saying that the good GM, in addition to crafting his own compelling story, takes cues from the players regarding what they are interested in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5405186, member: 4937"] Without knowing more about how you play and prep, I can't really say whether you are on an adventure path or in a sandbox. But the important point that has to be made is that I can't know which of the two you are doing because what you have described is (IMO) simply 'good DMing' and is a feature of either good linear or good sandbox play. Whether you are doing a sandbox, or whether you are constructing an adventure path from week to week, presumably the good DM is feeding the players situations that engauge their known concerns signalled via PC backstories plus choices made in previous episodes of play. I'd be doing that even if I was running the Dragon Lance moduels (as written, a very railroady adventure path) or if I was running an open ended 'pirate campaign' where the PC's sailed around in a boat exploring a world I had detailed. There is of course more than one axis by which game structures can be plotted and described. Linear vs. non-linear is not the only feature of games, adventures, and campaigns. Just because you can pick out a salient feature of your game that doesn't lie on the llinear vs. non-linear axis doesn't mean that the distinction between an adventure path and a sandbox isn't real. It could be that you are playing in a fuzzy grey area in the middle where you switch back and forth between linear preperation for the session (tonight A will happen, then B will happen, then C will happen) and sandbox preperation (typically a map, location details, random encounter tables of various sorts whether events, monsters, or weather, large lists of wandering NPC's, etc.), and so the most salient feature of your prep is the tailoring you do to the dramatic conflict and themes proposed by the players. The axis you are talking about, who controls the dramatic theme of play, is an interesting one - one that gets alot of discussion at Forge - but it doesn't mean that play isn't linear vs. non-linear. One additional way to describe a Railroad (the game type, as opposed to the act of railroading) is that it is not only linear, but the players have no ability through play to control or choose the dramatic conflict or the themes of the story. It is usually a feature of sandboxing that the players have greater control over the theme than in linear play, but its quite easy to imagine a Rowboat world where the players don't control the theme because there is no theme and they lack the ability to create meaningful dramatic conflict because the GM simply isn't putting enough effort into the story. Similarly, we could imagine a DM running the Dragon Lance modules with player created characters rather than pre-generated ones, and the DM tailoring the game to the conflicts generated by those party and intraparty conflicts rather than the stock ones presented by the modules and official story. The story is still on the whole linear with familiar places and events, if slightly different from the linear one presented in the modules, but the small events of the story revolve around different tensions and the PC's may have different presumed relationships with various NPC's. One of the original PC's might for example turn out to have been a dragon all along. Another might end up being a dragon Highlord's son, etc. Lastly, I don't want to give the impression that I think good GMing means that the players are solely in control of the stories dramatic themes. The GM is a player too, and as the player most invested in the game (in terms of time and effort put into it, for example) the GM has a the reasonable expectation of having very large say what the story is about. Most players expect and have a reasonable expectation that the GM has a very interesting, exciting, twist filled, and thought provoking story in mind. Very little to me says poor DMing like a DM that doesn't have a story in mind and expects the players to effectively do all the work of world and story creation. I'm just saying that the good GM, in addition to crafting his own compelling story, takes cues from the players regarding what they are interested in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
"Railroading" is just a pejorative term for...
Top