Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rain of Blows
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazydwarf" data-source="post: 4447168" data-attributes="member: 73982"><p>Well I never said it wasn't. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>Since ALL ways of reading it bug me in one way or other I simply took the one that bugged me the least.</p><p> </p><p>It has a goldylocks syndrome going here..</p><p>2-4 attacks seems like too much.</p><p>1-2 attacks seems like too little.</p><p>2-3 attacks seems just right.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Doesn't that leave the damage of the second primary attack unspecified instead, or at best assumed to be identical to the first ?</p><p>That seems a bit inconsistent to me, with how other powers are written.</p><p> </p><p><strong>But</strong> that would indeed then grant 4 attacks as a maximum.</p><p>Problem then is that this seems like way too much for a level 3 power, but meh...I like my fighters striker:ish anyway. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p> </p><p>@Hypersmurf:</p><p>Posted while I was typing heh.</p><p>Well it makes sense then I guess, we must assume the primary attacks are equal and wasn't typed out because of that.</p><p>(other powers I have been comparing with that grants more attacks has different damage values on them)</p><p> </p><p>4 it is then !</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazydwarf, post: 4447168, member: 73982"] Well I never said it wasn't. :) Since ALL ways of reading it bug me in one way or other I simply took the one that bugged me the least. It has a goldylocks syndrome going here.. 2-4 attacks seems like too much. 1-2 attacks seems like too little. 2-3 attacks seems just right. Doesn't that leave the damage of the second primary attack unspecified instead, or at best assumed to be identical to the first ? That seems a bit inconsistent to me, with how other powers are written. [B]But[/B] that would indeed then grant 4 attacks as a maximum. Problem then is that this seems like way too much for a level 3 power, but meh...I like my fighters striker:ish anyway. :D @Hypersmurf: Posted while I was typing heh. Well it makes sense then I guess, we must assume the primary attacks are equal and wasn't typed out because of that. (other powers I have been comparing with that grants more attacks has different damage values on them) 4 it is then ! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rain of Blows
Top