Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 3695947" data-attributes="member: 5038">Never had that happen with any group I have played with. However, my GMs and other players would  put up with that.more strategically? Less recklessness? That's your experience. Mine differs. Its a playstyle thing.  In the groups I game with, the players like their characters, enjoy playing them, but if they die, its "just that sucks,. oh well.  They don't view it as failure, just stuff happens. Then, we later recall the exploits and how cool the character was. If a character dies a spectacular death with we'll talk about that to.  I take that back we did have one player who was competitive. He was told chill as its just a game.  He couldn't and was eventually removed after another player, who stood up for keeping him in the group (we were short on players), decided to take a crack at running.  The guy running decided that the competitive player was taking it too serious and it was annoying to the the GM and rest of the group.  After several conversations, the guy was not invited back (we were already back up to six pcs without him) and told that for gamng he would be better finding a group with his approach.  However, we still invited him to hang out when we did other stuff like go to movies.Not a knock against the competive player. His style just didnt' mesh with everyone else's</blockquote>