Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rake and Pounce confusion? [2004 Thread]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rath the Brown" data-source="post: 1432453" data-attributes="member: 9665"><p>I'm going to have to disagree with most of what Thanee said.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1. No, a leopard (or any other creature with rake) does not automatically get ANY rake attacks on a pounce; re-read the description (emphasis mine)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It DOES matter; see above. The creature must be grappling before it can use rake to gain extra attacks. If the creature was not successful in establishing a hold, it does not gain rake attacks. Pounce just allows a creature to make rake attacks in the round that it started the grapple.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mostly true.</p><p></p><p>3. NONE. To get more than your normal single attack, you must take a full-attack action.</p><p></p><p>4. Two. Since the Rake ability states that a creature usually gets two attacks, and the leopard's description doesn't counter Rake's description, the leopard would get two.</p><p></p><p>5. They are both right. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> The Improved Grab in the leopard description is telling you that once the free grapple attempt is successful, the creature is now grappling and can rake as normal per the rake description, which states that a creature cannot rake in the turn that the creature initiated the grapple. Pounce is the exception since it clearly states that a creature can use rake in the same turn.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rath the Brown, post: 1432453, member: 9665"] I'm going to have to disagree with most of what Thanee said. 1. No, a leopard (or any other creature with rake) does not automatically get ANY rake attacks on a pounce; re-read the description (emphasis mine) It DOES matter; see above. The creature must be grappling before it can use rake to gain extra attacks. If the creature was not successful in establishing a hold, it does not gain rake attacks. Pounce just allows a creature to make rake attacks in the round that it started the grapple. Mostly true. 3. NONE. To get more than your normal single attack, you must take a full-attack action. 4. Two. Since the Rake ability states that a creature usually gets two attacks, and the leopard's description doesn't counter Rake's description, the leopard would get two. 5. They are both right. ;) The Improved Grab in the leopard description is telling you that once the free grapple attempt is successful, the creature is now grappling and can rake as normal per the rake description, which states that a creature cannot rake in the turn that the creature initiated the grapple. Pounce is the exception since it clearly states that a creature can use rake in the same turn. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rake and Pounce confusion? [2004 Thread]
Top