Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Painfully" data-source="post: 221657" data-attributes="member: 601">The way I would use a rakshasa is as a political figure already in power or with some prestige.&nbsp; His followers might actively cover for him or carry out his wishes but the rakshasa himself would rarely be seen.A mind-reading creature SHOULD be able to manipulate his way into power in most situations, especially as a gypsy fortuneteller or such.&nbsp; He might be a traveling dignitary or advisor to a lord (possibly even a good lord).I've personally considered using a rakshasa druid that maintains control of a dark (evil) forest.&nbsp; I was initially concerned over the spell immunity as you might have read in the other thread, nevertheless, I am not about to suggest crossbow bolts will slay him.&nbsp; Druids are natural shapeshifters after all&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Painfully, post: 221657, member: 601"] The way I would use a rakshasa is as a political figure already in power or with some prestige. His followers might actively cover for him or carry out his wishes but the rakshasa himself would rarely be seen. A mind-reading creature SHOULD be able to manipulate his way into power in most situations, especially as a gypsy fortuneteller or such. He might be a traveling dignitary or advisor to a lord (possibly even a good lord). I've personally considered using a rakshasa druid that maintains control of a dark (evil) forest. I was initially concerned over the spell immunity as you might have read in the other thread, nevertheless, I am not about to suggest crossbow bolts will slay him. Druids are natural shapeshifters after all :) [/QUOTE]

Verification