Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 7802939" data-attributes="member: 6787503">[USER=29398]@Lanefan[/USER], I had to look at the 1E PHB to remind myself how multiclassing (and human two-classing) works in 1E.Yes, 10% looks right on the money if you want to extend multiclassing to humans, as 5E does. Since I’m going for the Gygaxian aesthetic, I’m tempted to just stick with the multiclass percentages given for each demihuman race, which leaves dragonborn, humans, and Tieflings out in the cold, but I guess they could still multiclass going forward (which begins to look a little like replicating the humans with two classes rule).Either way, if starting at 3rd level or higher, I’d give any character that qualifies as multiclassed an additional 25% chance of being triple-classed.All levels would be distributed evenly between classes, priority going In the order rolled, and the first class rolled would be treated as the character’s 1st level class.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 7802939, member: 6787503"] [USER=29398]@Lanefan[/USER], I had to look at the 1E PHB to remind myself how multiclassing (and human two-classing) works in 1E. Yes, 10% looks right on the money if you want to extend multiclassing to humans, as 5E does. Since I’m going for the Gygaxian aesthetic, I’m tempted to just stick with the multiclass percentages given for each demihuman race, which leaves dragonborn, humans, and Tieflings out in the cold, but I guess they could still multiclass going forward (which begins to look a little like replicating the humans with two classes rule). Either way, if starting at 3rd level or higher, I’d give any character that qualifies as multiclassed an additional 25% chance of being triple-classed. All levels would be distributed evenly between classes, priority going In the order rolled, and the first class rolled would be treated as the character’s 1st level class. [/QUOTE]

Verification