Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 6313737" data-attributes="member: 18">It's one of those times you can be technically "right", yet that actually be actively degrading the quality of discussion, I feel, personally. It's an argument that has nothing to do with the rules, or the game, really, just the semantics of the English language.Alternately and more kindly one could say:"Technically correct, the best kind of correct!"On a completely different note:One thing not much considered yet is that this is the Starter Set table - presumably the actual PHB will offer a more interesting set of weapons.Er, is 5E then on 2 strikes for you with a very likely 3rd coming up, then? I mean, as of October playtest, Polearms, with a Feat, were Double, Heavy, Two-handed weapons, which, for a Fighter with the Two-Handed style, do damage on a miss, and had Reach, which, with the same Feat, acted kind of like Threatening Reach.It seems kind of unlikely that'll have changed, but I guess you live in hope, like the rest of us. Does seem a little strange you called yourself DDNFan, when, apparently, just the material in the October playtest was enough to make you "out" of the game.</blockquote>