Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranged Attack Hitting Your Buddy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Menexenus" data-source="post: 1802868" data-attributes="member: 8951"><p>I want to make sure that my understanding of these rules is correct. (So please correct me if I'm wrong/you disagree.)</p><p></p><p>There is a -4 penalty for firing into a melee that involves a friendly character. But this has nothing to do with cover. The -4 is there just because you are (presumably) being "extra careful" as you take the shot (and you are foregoing certain target zones on your opponent that could endanger your friend). However, the opponent would get an *additional* +4 to AC if it turned out that the friendly character (or any other character, for that matter) was positioned in such a way that the friendly character disrupts the shooter's line of sight with the target, i.e., provides cover.</p><p></p><p>So just because a friendly character is in melee with an opponent, that does not necessarily mean that a shot will have a chance of hitting the friendly character. The friendly character only has a chance of being hit if that friendly character is also providing cover for the target.</p><p></p><p>This is the way I've always understood the rules to work. Is this correct?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Menexenus, post: 1802868, member: 8951"] I want to make sure that my understanding of these rules is correct. (So please correct me if I'm wrong/you disagree.) There is a -4 penalty for firing into a melee that involves a friendly character. But this has nothing to do with cover. The -4 is there just because you are (presumably) being "extra careful" as you take the shot (and you are foregoing certain target zones on your opponent that could endanger your friend). However, the opponent would get an *additional* +4 to AC if it turned out that the friendly character (or any other character, for that matter) was positioned in such a way that the friendly character disrupts the shooter's line of sight with the target, i.e., provides cover. So just because a friendly character is in melee with an opponent, that does not necessarily mean that a shot will have a chance of hitting the friendly character. The friendly character only has a chance of being hit if that friendly character is also providing cover for the target. This is the way I've always understood the rules to work. Is this correct? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ranged Attack Hitting Your Buddy
Top